These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11141945)
1. [First results of a national hearing screening program in Switzerlans]. Zehnder A; Probst R; Vischer M; Linder T Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():71S-74S. PubMed ID: 11141945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Universal hearing screening in the Champagne-Ardenne regions: results and consideration after 55 000 births from January 2004 to June 2007]. Langagne T; Schmidt P; Leveque M; Chays A Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2008; 129(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19694157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme. Cao-Nguyen MH; Kos MI; Guyot JP Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1591-5. PubMed ID: 17719096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne. Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units. van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH; Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries. Bansal S; Gupta A; Nagarkar A Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN; Dhawan R J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further examination of infants referred from newborn hearing screening. Wada T; Kubo T; Aiba T; Yamane H Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 Oct; (554):17-25. PubMed ID: 15513505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors. De Capua B; De Felice C; Costantini D; Bagnoli F; Passali D Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polish universal neonatal hearing screening program-4-year experience (2003-2006). Szyfter W; Wróbel M; Radziszewska-Konopka M; Szyfter-Harris J; Karlik M Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1783-7. PubMed ID: 18922586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Incidence of hypoacusia secondary to hyperbilirubinaemia in a universal neonatal auditory screening programme based on otoacoustic emissions and evoked auditory potentials]. Núñez-Batalla F; Carro-Fernández P; Antuña-León ME; González-Trelles T Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 Mar; 59(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 18364202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns. Kezirian EJ; White KR; Yueh B; Sullivan SD Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Making universal newborn hearing screening a success. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 70(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 16029898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response. Lin HC; Shu MT; Lee KS; Ho GM; Fu TY; Bruna S; Lin G Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes and efficacy of newborn hearing screening: strengths and weaknesses (success or failure?). Korres S; Nikolopoulos TP; Peraki EE; Tsiakou M; Karakitsou M; Apostolopoulos N; Economides J; Balatsouras D; Ferekidis E Laryngoscope; 2008 Jul; 118(7):1253-6. PubMed ID: 18401271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]