These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11142606)

  • 1. Variance and confidence limits in validation studies based on comparison between three different types of measurements.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Riboli E
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire assessment of carotenoid and vitamin E intake using weighed food records and plasma biomarkers: the method of triads model.
    McNaughton SA; Marks GC; Gaffney P; Williams G; Green A
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Feb; 59(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 15483635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation studies in epidemiology: the relative precision of different designs.
    Wong M; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 11234737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within- and between-cohort variation in measured macronutrient intakes, taking account of measurement errors, in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study.
    Ferrari P; Kaaks R; Fahey MT; Slimani N; Day NE; Pera G; Boshuizen HC; Roddam A; Boeing H; Nagel G; Thiebaut A; Orfanos P; Krogh V; Braaten T; Riboli E;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 160(8):814-22. PubMed ID: 15466504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from bivariate logistic regression.
    Shoukri MM; Mian IU
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1409-19. PubMed ID: 8841651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When should one adjust for measurement error in baseline variables in observational studies?
    Walter SD; Forbes A; Chan S; Macaskill P; Irwig L
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 21259307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlated measurement error--implications for nutritional epidemiology.
    Day NE; Wong MY; Bingham S; Khaw KT; Luben R; Michels KB; Welch A; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 33(6):1373-81. PubMed ID: 15333617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence intervals and sample-size calculations for the sisterhood method of estimating maternal mortality.
    Hanley JA; Hagen CA; Shiferaw T
    Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 8875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
    Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.