274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11143167)
1. Evaluating and selecting needlestick-prevention devices.
Healthc Hazard Manage Monit; 2000 Oct; 14(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11143167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Selling safety: needle law change won't be painless.
DeJohn P
Hosp Mater Manage; 2001 Feb; 26(2):1, 9-11. PubMed ID: 11234085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Needlestick-prevention devices.
Health Devices; 1999 Oct; 28(10):381-408. PubMed ID: 10533680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating and selecting needlestick-prevention devices--Part two.
Healthc Hazard Manage Monit; 2000 Dec; 14(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11188118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety needles. New requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration bloodborne pathogens rule.
Cuny EJ; Fredekind R; Budenz AW
J Calif Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 27(7):525-30. PubMed ID: 10530110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety-engineered devices in 2012: the critical role of healthcare workers in device selection.
Jagger J; Perry J
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 34(6):615-8. PubMed ID: 23651893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A sticky issue: do sharps containers protect health care workers?
Jagger J; Bentley MB
Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Aug; 5(8):36-8. PubMed ID: 10159561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Un-stuck: needlesticks have declined--but can hospitals take the credit?
Asa R
Mater Manag Health Care; 1996 Dec; 5(12):32-4, 36. PubMed ID: 10164131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety-engineered needle devices: evaluation prior to introduction is essential.
Adams D; Elliott TS
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Oct; 79(2):174-5. PubMed ID: 21784551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bloodborne pathogens: toward safer needles.
Ellis T
J Healthc Prot Manage; 1999; 15(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 10557438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A sharp progression.
Foubister V
Mater Manag Health Care; 2003 May; 12(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 12822219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Occupational Safety and Health Administration urges surgeons to reduce sharps injuries in the surgical setting.
Michaels D
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Aug; 211(2):295. PubMed ID: 20670875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Safe equipment to prevent injuries in medical staff].
Gańczak M
Med Pr; 2007; 58(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 17571624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality. Sharper image. OSHA enforces bloodborne pathogen standards.
Piotrowski J
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun; 34(26):14. PubMed ID: 15242106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.
Trim JC
Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):144, 146-53. PubMed ID: 14997076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bloodborne pathogens: updating sharps safety.
Corbin DE
J Healthc Prot Manage; 2001; 17(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 11602984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical kit citings.
Sapper AG; Conn EJ
Mater Manag Health Care; 2004 Nov; 13(11):32. PubMed ID: 15603108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal legislation seals the deal. Needlestick safety bill reinforces existing regulations that mandate safe needles at hospitals.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2000 Oct; 30(44):40-1. PubMed ID: 11141841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hazard report: risk of needlestick injuries from failure of shielded i.v. catheters.
Healthc Hazard Manage Monit; 2002 Feb; 15(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 11828588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legislation improves needlestick safety and prevention.
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2001; 5(3):87. PubMed ID: 11899374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
