These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11143209)
1. A practical approach to evidence grading. Greer N; Mosser G; Logan G; Halaas GW Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 2000 Dec; 26(12):700-12. PubMed ID: 11143209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technology assessment at the Institute for Clinical Systems Integration and HealthPartners. Stecher TJ; Evans RW; Mosser G; Reed MK; Smith JC HMO Pract; 1995 Mar; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 10141347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to develop cost-conscious guidelines. Eccles M; Mason J Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(16):1-69. PubMed ID: 11427188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical process improvement: engage first, measure later. Mosser G Qual Manag Health Care; 1996; 4(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10159137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW; BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations. Manchikanti L Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs. Lohr KN Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Feb; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 15020556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The GRADE system for classification of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations in clinical guideline reports. Oñate-Ocaña LF; Ochoa-Carrillo FJ Cir Cir; 2009; 77(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 19944034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [From consensus to CBO guideline]. van Everdingen JJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Oct; 143(42):2086-9. PubMed ID: 10560556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data briefing. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence). Appleby J Health Serv J; 2000 Jun; 110(5708):32. PubMed ID: 11183800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [GRADE system: classification of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation]. Aguayo-Albasini JL; Flores-Pastor B; Soria-Aledo V Cir Esp; 2014 Feb; 92(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24361098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. Ebell MH; Siwek J; Weiss BD; Woolf SH; Susman JL; Ewigman B; Bowman M J Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 53(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 14764293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. WFSBP guidelines on how to grade treatment evidence for clinical guideline development. Hasan A; Bandelow B; Yatham LN; Berk M; Falkai P; Möller HJ; Kasper S; World J Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Jan; 20(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 30526182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of the role of NICE in promoting the adoption of innovative cardiac technologies. Groves PH; Pomfrett C; Marlow M Heart; 2018 Nov; 104(22):1817-1822. PubMed ID: 29773657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report. Guyatt G; Akl EA; Oxman A; Wilson K; Puhan MA; Wilt T; Gutterman D; Woodhead M; Antman EM; Schünemann HJ; Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 23256168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The development of the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence evidence-based clinical guidelines on motor neurone disease. Oliver D; Radunovic A; Allen A; McDermott C Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener; 2017 Aug; 18(5-6):313-323. PubMed ID: 28513234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE. Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():115-8. PubMed ID: 26845745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies. Brozek JL; Akl EA; Jaeschke R; Lang DM; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Ueffing E; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl J; Phillips B; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Allergy; 2009 Aug; 64(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 19489757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations. Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]