516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11143275)
1. Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP National Inpatient Sample.
Berthelsen CL
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):10-23. PubMed ID: 11143275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The biggest coding blunders--and how to avoid them.
Finger AL
Med Econ; 2000 Aug; 77(16):126-8, 131-4, 140-2. PubMed ID: 11010497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DRG benchmarking study establishes national coding norms.
Vaul JH
Healthc Financ Manage; 1998 May; 52(5):52-4. PubMed ID: 10179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benchmarking variation in coding accuracy across the United States.
Lorence DP; Ibrahim IA
J Health Care Finance; 2003; 29(4):29-42. PubMed ID: 12908652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multilevel reviews for coding accuracy.
Stavely S
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 11143277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manager's reports of variation in coding accuracy across U.S. oncology centers.
Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
J Oncol Manag; 2002; 11(6):20-6. PubMed ID: 12502289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy.
Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):15-25. PubMed ID: 12561390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. UB-82 forms offer wealth of information, misinformation.
Gardner E
Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(38):18-9, 22-9. PubMed ID: 10106206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of statistical analysis in assessing appropriate documentation and coding.
Rudman WJ; Hewitt CR
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):41-50. PubMed ID: 11143279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of the uses of ICD-9-CM coding: Medicare risk adjustment methodology for managed care plans.
Tully L; Rulon V
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 11143281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apply APGs to claims data to calculate impact of new reimbursement levels.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Jan; 2(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 10345352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Episode Treatment Groups (ETGs): a patient classification system for measuring outcomes performance by episode of illness.
Forthman MT; Dove HG; Wooster LD
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):51-61. PubMed ID: 11143280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ICD-9-CM code and coding practice changes for case mix management.
Young WW
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Mar; 57(3):29-33. PubMed ID: 10311444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic coding quality and its impact on healthcare reimbursement: research prospectives.
Waterstraat FL; Barlow J; Newman F
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Sep; 61(9):52-9. PubMed ID: 10113309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare data study spotlights coding errors.
Cottrell C
J AHIMA; 2000 Sep; 71(8):58-9. PubMed ID: 11186626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Case study: clinical documentation improvement program supports coding accuracy.
Danzi JT; Masencup B; Brucker MA; Dixon-Lee C
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 11143276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coding accuracy ultimately affects the bottom line.
Rode D
Healthc Financ Manage; 1991 Nov; 45(11):104, 106. PubMed ID: 10145522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmarking with national ICD-9-CM coded data.
Osborn CE
J AHIMA; 1999 Mar; 70(3):59-69. PubMed ID: 10345527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system.
Hsia DC; Krushat WM; Fagan AB; Tebbutt JA; Kusserow RP
N Engl J Med; 1988 Feb; 318(6):352-5. PubMed ID: 3123929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ICD-9-CM Committee looks ahead to October 2001.
Prophet S
J AHIMA; 2000 Sep; 71(8):70-7. PubMed ID: 11186633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
