These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11143457)

  • 1. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?
    Inhoff AW; Starr M; Shindler KL
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Oct; 62(7):1474-84. PubMed ID: 11143457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extraction of linguistic information from successive words during reading: evidence for spatially distributed lexical processing.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):662-77. PubMed ID: 23088508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Eiter BM; Radach R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):979-95. PubMed ID: 16262493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals.
    Altarriba J; Kambe G; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):875-90. PubMed ID: 11521853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):805-17. PubMed ID: 19742385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading.
    Blanchard HE; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 2755766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: the role of letter and word units.
    Inhoff AW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Apr; 73(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 2353591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual constraint and N + 2 preview effects in reading.
    Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Juhasz B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):803-27. PubMed ID: 12850988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.
    Drieghe D; Rayner K; Pollatsek A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Aug; 61(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 17853202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.