These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11144586)

  • 21. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR) with an integrated stimulus generator in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Peter O; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Aug; 173(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 18621081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. RFcap: a software analysis tool for multichannel cochlear implant signals.
    Lai WK; Dillier N
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Mar; 14(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 21762546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Wearable digital speech processor for cochlear implants using a TMS320C25.
    Dillier N; Senn C; Schlatter T; Stöckli M; Utzinger U
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():120-7. PubMed ID: 2356719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhancing availability of the electronic image record for patients and caregivers during follow-up care.
    Mehta A; Dreyer K; Thrall J
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):78-80. PubMed ID: 10342173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments.
    Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jul; 172(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 18538414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Digital signal processing of a novel neuron discharge model stimulation strategy for cochlear implants].
    Yang Y; Xu Y; Miu J; Zhou L; Xiao Z
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1435-9. PubMed ID: 23076179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deficits in auditory frequency discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Turgeon C; Champoux F; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 25117940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A versatile system for the generation and the development of speech coding strategies in cochlear implants.
    Tönder N; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jun; 45(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 9609942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What should be implemented in future cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():268-75. PubMed ID: 2356735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefits of upgrading to the Nucleus
    Todorov MJ; Galvin KL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):210-215. PubMed ID: 29566583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Performance of the Harmony™ behind-the-ear processor with the first generation of Advanced Bionics™ implant systems.
    Brendel M; Rottmann T; Lenarz T; Buechner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jan; 14(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 23340091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new approach for speech synthesis in cochlear implant systems based on electrophysiological factors.
    Zarei E; Sadjedi H
    Technol Health Care; 2017; 25(2):221-235. PubMed ID: 27689564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multielectrode cochlear implant.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Vandali AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3367-71. PubMed ID: 1619114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.