These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11145082)

  • 1. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity.
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2000; 29(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 11145082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.
    Mondloch CJ; Elms N; Maurer D; Rhodes G; Hayward WG; Tanaka JW; Zhou G
    Perception; 2010; 39(8):1065-85. PubMed ID: 20942358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?
    Collishaw SM; Hole GJ
    Perception; 2002; 31(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 11954691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The development of face recognition: featural or configurational processing?
    Baenninger M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1994 Jun; 57(3):377-96. PubMed ID: 8027706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces.
    Hole GJ
    Perception; 1994; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 7936977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Famous faces as icons. The illusion of being an expert in the recognition of famous faces.
    Carbon CC
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):801-6. PubMed ID: 18605151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
    Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
    Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.