BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11145306)

  • 1. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
    Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
    Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
    Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The alkaline single cell electrophoresis assay with eight mouse organs: results with 22 mono-functional alkylating agents (including 9 dialkyl N-nitrosoamines) and 10 DNA crosslinkers.
    Tsuda S; Matsusaka N; Madarame H; Miyamae Y; Ishida K; Satoh M; Sekihashi K; Sasaki YF
    Mutat Res; 2000 Apr; 467(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 10771273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of the International Validation of the in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay for the detection of genotoxic carcinogens: Individual data for 1,2-dibromoethane, p-anisidine, and o-anthranilic acid in the 2nd step of the 4th phase Validation Study under the JaCVAM initiative.
    Takasawa H; Takashima R; Narumi K; Kawasako K; Hattori A; Kawabata M; Hamada S
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jul; 786-788():144-50. PubMed ID: 26212305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative investigation of multiple organs of mice and rats in the comet assay.
    Sekihashi K; Yamamoto A; Matsumura Y; Ueno S; Watanabe-Akanuma M; Kassie F; Knasmüller S; Tsuda S; Sasaki YF
    Mutat Res; 2002 May; 517(1-2):53-75. PubMed ID: 12034309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The JaCVAM international validation study on the in vivo comet assay: Selection of test chemicals.
    Morita T; Uno Y; Honma M; Kojima H; Hayashi M; Tice RR; Corvi R; Schechtman L
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jul; 786-788():14-44. PubMed ID: 26212294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. JaCVAM-organized international validation study of the in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay for detection of genotoxic carcinogens: II. Summary of definitive validation study results.
    Uno Y; Kojima H; Omori T; Corvi R; Honma M; Schechtman LM; Tice RR; Beevers C; De Boeck M; Burlinson B; Hobbs CA; Kitamoto S; Kraynak AR; McNamee J; Nakagawa Y; Pant K; Plappert-Helbig U; Priestley C; Takasawa H; Wada K; Wirnitzer U; Asano N; Escobar PA; Lovell D; Morita T; Nakajima M; Ohno Y; Hayashi M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jul; 786-788():45-76. PubMed ID: 26212295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
    Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
    Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical appraisal of the sensitivity of in vivo genotoxicity assays in detecting human carcinogens.
    Zeller A; Pfuhler S; Albertini S; Bringezu F; Czich A; Dietz Y; Fautz R; Hewitt NJ; Kirst A; Kasper P
    Mutagenesis; 2018 Apr; 33(2):179-193. PubMed ID: 29669112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
    Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combinations of genotoxic tests for the evaluation of group 1 IARC carcinogens.
    Bhagat J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):81-99. PubMed ID: 28695982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo Comet assay on isolated kidney cells to distinguish genotoxic carcinogens from epigenetic carcinogens or cytotoxic compounds.
    Nesslany F; Zennouche N; Simar-Meintières S; Talahari I; Nkili-Mboui EN; Marzin D
    Mutat Res; 2007 Jun; 630(1-2):28-41. PubMed ID: 17507283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of intraperitoneal and oral gavage administration in comet assay in mouse eight organs.
    Sekihashi K; Sasaki T; Yamamoto A; Kawamura K; Ikka T; Tsuda S; Sasaki YF
    Mutat Res; 2001 Jun; 493(1-2):39-54. PubMed ID: 11516714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.
    Kirkland D; Speit G
    Mutat Res; 2008 Jul; 654(2):114-32. PubMed ID: 18585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
    Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comet assay evaluation of six chemicals of known genotoxic potential in rats.
    Hobbs CA; Recio L; Streicker M; Boyle MH; Tanaka J; Shiga A; Witt KL
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jul; 786-788():172-81. PubMed ID: 26212309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the utility of the lifetime mouse bioassay in the identification of cancer hazards for humans.
    Osimitz TG; Droege W; Boobis AR; Lake BG
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2013 Oct; 60():550-62. PubMed ID: 23954551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of comet and micronucleus assays in metabolic competent HepaRG cells to predict in vivo genotoxicity.
    Le Hégarat L; Mourot A; Huet S; Vasseur L; Camus S; Chesné C; Fessard V
    Toxicol Sci; 2014 Apr; 138(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 24431211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 67.