These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11145777)

  • 1. Achieving graphical excellence: suggestions and methods for creating high-quality visual displays of experimental data.
    Schriger DL; Cooper RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 11145777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of the graphical literacy of Annals of Emergency Medicine.
    Cooper RJ; Schriger DL; Tashman DA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11145765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graphical literacy: the quality of graphs in a large-circulation journal.
    Cooper RJ; Schriger DL; Close RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 12192357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal.
    Lukić IK; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 11593496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More medical journals should inform their contributors about three key principles of graph construction.
    Puhan MA; ter Riet G; Eichler K; Steurer J; Bachmann LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 59(10):1017-22. PubMed ID: 16980140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
    Bayne SC; McGivney GP; Mazer SC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):201-18. PubMed ID: 12616242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical guide to choosing an appropriate data display.
    Paniello RC; Neely JG; Rich JT; Slattery EL; Voelker CC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Dec; 145(6):886-94. PubMed ID: 21975544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical and methodological standards for laboratory and medical biological rhythm research.
    Portaluppi F; Touitou Y; Smolensky MH
    Chronobiol Int; 2008 Nov; 25(6):999-1016. PubMed ID: 19005901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specification of laboratory animal use in scientific articles: current low detail in the journals' instructions for authors and some proposals.
    Alfaro V
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 27(7):495-502. PubMed ID: 16258595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graphical data presentation.
    Stengel D; Calori GM; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2008 Jun; 39(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 18502424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of medical journals with special reference to the Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal.
    Aly AM
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S18-20. PubMed ID: 14968186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Authors, editors, policy makers, and the impact factor.
    Huth EJ
    Croat Med J; 2001 Feb; 42(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 11172650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data.
    Cleveland WS; McGill R
    Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4716):828-33. PubMed ID: 17777913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [How to attract more and better manuscripts to be published in Chilean biomedical journals].
    Oyarzún M
    Rev Med Chil; 2002 Mar; 130(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 12043368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Problems faced by editors of peer reviewed medical journals.
    Jawaid SA
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S21-5. PubMed ID: 14968187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.