BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11146017)

  • 1. The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in normotensive individuals.
    Pesola GR; Pesola HR; Nelson MJ; Westfal RE
    Am J Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 19(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 11146017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The normal difference in bilateral indirect blood pressure recordings in hypertensive individuals.
    Pesola GR; Pesola HR; Lin M; Nelson MJ; Westfal RE
    Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Apr; 9(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 11927464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of blood pressure discrepancies in third-trimester hypertensive gravidas.
    Ray WT
    AANA J; 2000 Dec; 68(6):525-30. PubMed ID: 11272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chiropractic manipulation affects the difference between arterial systolic blood pressures on the left and right in normotensive subjects.
    Dimmick KR; Young MF; Newell D
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jan; 29(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 16396729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicentric, clinical trial of S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg versus Amlodipine 5 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension--a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Pathak L; Hiremath ; Kerkar PG; Manade VG
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2004 Mar; 52():197-202. PubMed ID: 15636308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of aortic and brachial cuff pressures in flat supine and lateral recumbent positions.
    Newton KM
    Heart Lung; 1981; 10(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 6912233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between right and left arm blood pressures in the elderly.
    Hashimoto F; Hunt WC; Hardy L
    West J Med; 1984 Aug; 141(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 6495723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of blood pressure measurements depending on the place and method of measurement in individuals with normal blood pressure and borderline hypertension].
    Przestalska-Malkin H; Kupść W; Szcześniewska D
    Przegl Epidemiol; 1989; 43(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 2641167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
    Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.
    Netea RT; Lenders JW; Smits P; Thien T
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jul; 17(7):459-62. PubMed ID: 12821952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different body positions on blood pressure.
    Eşer I; Khorshid L; Güneş UY; Demir Y
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jan; 16(1):137-40. PubMed ID: 17181675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The position of the arm during blood pressure measurement in sitting position.
    Adiyaman A; Verhoeff R; Lenders JW; Deinum J; Thien T
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Dec; 11(6):309-13. PubMed ID: 17106314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can validated wrist devices with position sensors replace arm devices for self-home blood pressure monitoring? A randomized crossover trial using ambulatory monitoring as reference.
    Stergiou GS; Christodoulakis GR; Nasothimiou EG; Giovas PP; Kalogeropoulos PG
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jul; 21(7):753-8. PubMed ID: 18443566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining blood pressure in pregnancy. Positional hydrostatic effects.
    Hallak M; Bottoms SF; Knudson K; Zarfati D; Abramovici H
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):333-6. PubMed ID: 9219119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of normal and large sphygmomanometer cuffs using the Omron 705CP.
    Aylett M; Marples G; Jones K; Rhodes D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2001 Feb; 15(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 11317193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of fourth and fifth Korotkoff diastolic blood pressures in 5 to 30 year old individuals. The Bogalusa Heart Study.
    Hammond IW; Urbina EM; Wattigney WA; Bao W; Steinmann WC; Berenson GS
    Am J Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 8(11):1083-9. PubMed ID: 8554731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-measured blood pressures at home and during consulting hours: are there any differences?
    Mengden T; Bättig B; Edmonds D; Jeck T; Huss R; Sachindis A; Schubert M; Feltkamp H; Vetter W
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1990 Sep; 8(4):S15-9. PubMed ID: 2258778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.