These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11147875)

  • 1. Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study.
    Kettler A; Wilke HJ; Claes L
    J Neurosurg; 2001 Jan; 94(1 Suppl):97-107. PubMed ID: 11147875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements: an in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Goetz C; Claes L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(21):2762-70. PubMed ID: 11064521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of 3 different cages and bone cement for fusion of cervical vertebrae segments].
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Claes L
    Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 12089797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement.
    Wilke HJ; Kettler A; Claes L
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Oct; 9(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 11057535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
    Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multidirectional stabilizing potential of BAK interbody spinal fusion system for anterior surgery.
    Nibu K; Panjabi MM; Oxland T; Cholewicki J
    J Spinal Disord; 1997 Aug; 10(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 9278922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Dislocation tendency, stabilizing effect and sintering tendency of different lumbar vertebrae cages in an in vitro experiment].
    Kettler A; Dietl R; Krammer M; Lumenta CB; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Orthopade; 2002 May; 31(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 12089798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study.
    Du L; Sun XJ; Zhou TJ; Li YC; Chen C; Zhao CQ; Zhang K; Zhao J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29162074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.