These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11148303)

  • 41. It's special the way you say it: an ERP investigation on the temporal dynamics of two types of prosody.
    Paulmann S; Jessen S; Kotz SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1609-20. PubMed ID: 22465251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: insights from event-related brain potentials.
    Ozyürek A; Willems RM; Kita S; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):605-16. PubMed ID: 17381252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A hierarchical linear modeling analysis of working memory and implicit prosody in the resolution of adjunct attachment ambiguity.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Oct; 38(5):491-509. PubMed ID: 19377881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Ye Z; Zhan W; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1142():135-45. PubMed ID: 17303093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of prosodic structure on the interpretation of temporary syntactic ambiguity by young and elderly listeners.
    Kjelgaard MM; Titone DA; Wingfield A
    Exp Aging Res; 1999; 25(3):187-207. PubMed ID: 10467511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Written discourse and acquired brain impairment: evaluation of structural and semantic features of personal letters from a Systemic Functional Linguistic perspective.
    Mortensen L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2005; 19(3):227-47. PubMed ID: 15823958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of prosodic information on the processing of split particles: ERP evidence from spoken German.
    Isel F; Alter K; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 17(1):154-67. PubMed ID: 15701246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Testing the shared resource assumption in theories of text processing.
    Rawson KA
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Mar; 54(2):155-83. PubMed ID: 16893536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Aging and the use of sentential structure to facilitate word recognition.
    Holtzman RE; Familitant ME; Deptula P; Hoyer WJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1986; 12(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3569389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Revise and resubmit: how real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition.
    Pozzan L; Trueswell JC
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Aug; 80():73-108. PubMed ID: 26026607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effects of thematic context and presentation mode on memory for sentence voice.
    Kerr NH; Butler SF; Maykuth PL; Delis D
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1982 May; 11(3):247-64. PubMed ID: 7143278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cue conflicts in context: interplay between morphosyntax and discourse context in Danish preschoolers' semantic role assignment.
    Boeg Thomsen D; Poulsen M
    J Child Lang; 2015 Nov; 42(6):1237-66. PubMed ID: 26435080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension.
    Zwaan RA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1028-34. PubMed ID: 26088667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The hunt for structure-dependent interpretation: The case of Principle C.
    Lidz J; Lukyanenko C; Sutton M
    Cognition; 2021 Aug; 213():104676. PubMed ID: 33812653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Memory-based language processing: psycholinguistic research in the 1990s.
    McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():25-42. PubMed ID: 9496620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.
    Rajkumar R; van Schijndel M; White M; Schuler W
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():204-232. PubMed ID: 27428810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effectiveness of speech-language therapy at the discursive level: a case study of cognitive-linguistic deficit in dementia.
    Marquete VF; Chaves TA; Barreto SDS
    Codas; 2021; 33(2):e20200023. PubMed ID: 34008775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Identifying speech acts from contextual and linguistic information.
    Abbeduto L; Furman L; Davies B
    Lang Speech; 1989; 32 ( Pt 3)():189-203. PubMed ID: 2640474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What can prosody tell a parser?
    Nicol JL
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 Mar; 25(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 8667296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.