These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11148428)

  • 1. [Evaluation of clinical decision rules].
    Giraudeau B; Ravaud P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Dec; 48(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 11148428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.
    McBride KL
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():459-65. PubMed ID: 9116517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
    Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
    JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
    Libetta C; Burke D; Brennan P; Yassa J
    J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 10505914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.
    Kelly AM; Richards D; Kerr L; Grant J; O'Donovan P; Basire K; Graham R
    N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(982):294-5. PubMed ID: 8093158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Awareness and use of the Ottawa ankle and knee rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice?
    Graham ID; Stiell IG; Laupacis A; McAuley L; Howell M; Clancy M; Durieux P; Simon N; Emparanza JI; Aginaga JR; O'connor A; Wells G
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Mar; 37(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 11223761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ottawa Ankle Rules.
    Anis AH; Stiell IG; Stewart DG; Laupacis A
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Oct; 26(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 7574122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
    Stiell IG; McKnight RD; Greenberg GH; McDowell I; Nair RC; Wells GA; Johns C; Worthington JR
    JAMA; 1994 Mar; 271(11):827-32. PubMed ID: 8114236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France. A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Auleley GR; Ravaud P; Giraudeau B; Kerboull L; Nizard R; Massin P; Garreau de Loubresse C; Vallée C; Durieux P
    JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(24):1935-9. PubMed ID: 9200633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of implementing the Ottawa ankle rules on ankle radiography requests in A&E.
    Gwilym SE; Aslam N; Ribbans WJ; Holloway V
    Int J Clin Pract; 2003 Sep; 57(7):625-7. PubMed ID: 14529066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.
    Heyworth J
    BMJ; 2003 Feb; 326(7386):405-6. PubMed ID: 12595349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines.
    Cameron C; Naylor CD
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1165-8. PubMed ID: 10234347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.
    McCann B
    J Accid Emerg Med; 2000 Jan; 17(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 10659005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "real" Ottawa ankle rules.
    Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Wells GA
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jan; 27(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 8572439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical decision rules "in the real world": how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice.
    Brehaut JC; Stiell IG; Visentin L; Graham ID
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(10):948-56. PubMed ID: 16166599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ankle radiograph utilization after learning a decision rule: a 12-month follow-up.
    Verbeek PR; Stiell IG; Hebert G; Sellens C
    Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Aug; 4(8):776-9. PubMed ID: 9262694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules for the efficient utilization of radiographies in acute lesions of the ankle].
    Aginaga Badiola JR; Ventura Huarte I; Tejera Torroja E; Huarte Sanz I; Cuende Garcés A; Gómez Garcerán M; Labaca Arteaga J
    Aten Primaria; 1999 Sep; 24(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 10547910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
    Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of current local practice and the Ottawa Ankle Rules to determine the need for radiography in acute ankle injury.
    Singh-Ranger G; Marathias A
    Accid Emerg Nurs; 1999 Oct; 7(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10808759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
    Boutis K; Schuh S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Apr; 55(4):391-2; author reply 392-3. PubMed ID: 20346842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.