These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11150367)
1. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion. Heffernan L Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Kushnir TF Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart? Schmutz SD Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class. Mariner WK Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade. Robertson JA Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals. Benshoof J Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Maltz EM Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]