These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11150367)

  • 21. Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health.
    Cates W; Grimes DA; Hogue LL
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 7661225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B; Barbash F; Russell C
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lochner redeemed: family privacy after Troxel and Carhart.
    Meyer DD
    UCLA Law Rev; 2001 Jun; 48(5):1125-90. PubMed ID: 16273684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Harris v. McRae: whatever happened to the Roe v. Wade abortion right?
    Crocker L
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 1981; 8(3):861-97. PubMed ID: 11650497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
    Benshoof J
    JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High court hears clinic blockade case, as appeals court upholds abortion law.
    Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1991 Oct; (17):2-3. PubMed ID: 12284473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Legal abortion: the impending obsolescence of the trimester framework.
    Mangel CP
    Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 3068986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey?
    Paulsen MS
    Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In new court, Roe may stand, so foes look to limit its scope.
    Toner R; Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16060018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.
    Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 1986 Dec; 76(12):1452-5. PubMed ID: 3777296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):651-4. PubMed ID: 1640971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of stare decisis in the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade.
    Blaustein AP; Grant ER; Lohr AL; Todd KJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 2603863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The constitutional right to therapeutic cloning.
    Bellinger M
    J Med Law; 2002; 7(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 17256230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Partial-birth abortion: the final frontier of abortion jurisprudence.
    Bopp J; Cook CR
    Issues Law Med; 1998; 14(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 9707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.