162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 111504)
1. Focal spot size and scatter suppression in magnification mammography.
Muntz EP; Logan WW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 Sep; 133(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 111504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
Honda C; Ohara H
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
Law J
Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and dose in film-screen magnification mammography.
McParland BJ
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1068-77. PubMed ID: 11271899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of the ROC method in problems of image quality and quality control in mammography].
Wurm J; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):201-11. PubMed ID: 6215307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique.
Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjarngard BE
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
