162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 111504)
21. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies.
Sickles EA; Doi K; Genant HK
Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 897191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Focal-spot separation in stereoscopic magnification radiography.
Takahashi M; Ozawa Y; Takemoto H
Radiology; 1981 Jul; 140(1):227-9. PubMed ID: 7244229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neonatal magnification radiography using standard-focus x-ray tubes.
Nikesch W; Kuntzler CM; Cushing FR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Oct; 141(4):665-9. PubMed ID: 6604414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography.
Court LE; Speller R
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Nov; 40(11):1841-61. PubMed ID: 8587936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
Grahn A; Hemdal B; Andersson I; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Börjesson S; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG; Medin J; Wanninger F; Panzer W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [X-ray examination of the breast (author's transl)].
Friedrich M
Rontgenblatter; 1981 Apr; 34(4):151-60. PubMed ID: 7015468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mammographic resolution: influence of focal spot intensity distribution and geometry.
Nickoloff EL; Donnelly E; Eve L; Atherton JV; Asch T
Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):436-47. PubMed ID: 2385201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Considerations on direct magnification in radiology].
San Nicolò M; Moroder E
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(7-8):579-83. PubMed ID: 3737993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Slit camera focal spot measurement errors in mammography.
Tang S; Barnes GT; Tanner RL
Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1803-14. PubMed ID: 8587535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation of the line-pair pattern method for evaluating mammographic focal spot performance.
Goodsitt MM; Chan HP; Liu B
Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 9029537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [DIMA-magnification mammography. Phantom studies on image quality and radiation exposure of the patient].
Hermann KP; Funke M; Brüggemeyer H; Sperner W; Gruhl T; Koch R
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 9376560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Slit-aperture technic in mammography].
Friedrich M
Rofo; 1984 Nov; 141(5):574-82. PubMed ID: 6438724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of radiation dose, focal spot, and automatic exposure of newer film-screen mammography units.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Nov; 149(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 3499794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Direct radiological magnification of thin objects compared with contact exposures and mammographic techniques (author's transl)].
Franken T
Rofo; 1982 Apr; 136(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 6212485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammography in New Zealand: radiation dose and image quality.
Poletti JL; Williamson BD; Mitchell AW
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Jun; 14(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1747087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
