These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 111504)

  • 61. Effect of focal spot distribution on blood vessel imaging in magnification radiography.
    Doi K; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 1111012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. In vivo demonstration of small intestinal villi in dogs and monkeys using radiographic magnification.
    Goldberg HI; Gould R; Rosenquist J; Royal S; Owen RL; Silverman S
    Radiology; 1982 Jan; 142(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7053547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A method of evaluating and minimizing geometric unsharpness for mammographic X-ray units.
    Haus AG; Cowart RW; Dodd GD; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1978 Sep; 128(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 674652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optical versus radiographic magnification for fine-detail skeletal radiography.
    Genant HK; Doi K; Mall JC
    Invest Radiol; 1975; 10(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 46857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Wide-field resolution in radiography.
    Klein DJ; Bergeron RT; Bernstein H
    Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):811-5. PubMed ID: 841076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Dose efficiency and the effects of resolution and noise on detail perceptibility in radiographic magnification.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 7207424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Measurement of focal spot size in mammography X-ray tubes.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Jan; 66(781):44-50. PubMed ID: 8428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Recommended specifications for new mammography equipment: report of the ACR-CDC Focus Group on mammography equipment.
    Yaffe MJ; Hendrick RE; Feig SA; Rothenberg LN; Och J; Gagne R
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7568821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Magnification spot compression of the breast.
    Hall FM
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):284. PubMed ID: 2781025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. SU-E-I-27: Effect of Focal Spot Choice on the System Performance of a High- Resolution Micro-Angiographic Fluoroscope (MAF) Detector.
    Jain A; Panse A; Ionita C; Bednarek D; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3631. PubMed ID: 28519499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Mammography focal spot measurement with a star pattern: techniques to avoid inaccuracies.
    Kimme-Smith C; Chatziioannou A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 8455518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of x-ray effective focal spot size dependency on x-ray exposure settings using edge response analysis.
    Shimakawa Y; Nishiki M; Yanagita S; Nishikawa N; Sakai T; Ito H; Ochi S; Yanagawa N
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Mar; 16(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 36515865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Microfocal spot magnification mammography.
    Tabár L
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():62-8. PubMed ID: 6701383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Focal spot size reduction using asymmetric collimation to enable reduced anode angles with a conventional angiographic x-ray tube for use with high resolution detectors.
    Russ M; Shankar A; Setlur Nagesh SV; Ionita CN; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Feb; 10132():. PubMed ID: 28603334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Radiographic imaging using an effective rotationally symmetrical focal spot.
    Goodenough DJ; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 May; 119(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 1265275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Magnification of 100 mm spot film.
    Nepper-Rasmussen J; Halaburt H
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Nov; 61(731):1065-6. PubMed ID: 3208011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of a radiographic imaging system with a microfocal spot x-ray tube. The usefulness of three- to fivefold magnification.
    Hollander BA; Hilal SK; Seaman WB
    Radiology; 1972 Jun; 103(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 5022966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Overcoming x-ray tube small focal spot output limitations for high-resolution region of interest imaging.
    Gupta SK; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Rudin S
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2012; 8313():. PubMed ID: 22905312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Resolution and contrast reduction.
    Shuping RE; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 732771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Improved method of magnification factor calculation for the angiographic measurement of neurovascular lesion dimensions.
    Wang Z; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Miskolczi L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 12132949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.