These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11151961)

  • 1. Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO PI-R.
    Reise SP; Henson JM
    Assessment; 2000 Dec; 7(4):347-64. PubMed ID: 11151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing countdown- and IRT-based approaches to computerized adaptive personality testing.
    Rudick MM; Yam WH; Simms LJ
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):769-79. PubMed ID: 23647045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computer adaptive testing: an illustration with the NEO PI-R.
    Makransky G; Mortensen EL; Glas CA
    Assessment; 2013 Feb; 20(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 22357698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functioning and validity of a Computerized Adaptive Test to measure anxiety (A-CAT).
    Becker J; Fliege H; Kocalevent RD; Bjorner JB; Rose M; Walter OB; Klapp BF
    Depress Anxiety; 2008; 25(12):E182-94. PubMed ID: 18979458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing adolescents' personality with the NEO PI-R.
    De Fruyt F; Mervielde I; Hoekstra HA; Rolland JP
    Assessment; 2000 Dec; 7(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 11172584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
    Saucier G
    J Pers Assess; 1998 Apr; 70(2):263-76. PubMed ID: 9697330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model.
    Maples JL; Guan L; Carter NT; Miller JD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1070-84. PubMed ID: 24932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. NEO Personality Inventory. Interpersonal Adjective Scales.
    Kurtz JE; Lee PA; Sherker JL
    Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 10335016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Usability of CAT System for Assessing the Depressive Level of Japanese-A Study on Psychometric Properties and Response Behavior.
    Iwata N; Kikuchi K; Fujihara Y
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 26272358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study.
    Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized adaptive personality testing: a review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version.
    Forbey JD; Ben-Porath YS
    Psychol Assess; 2007 Mar; 19(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 17371120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computerized adaptive testing of population psychological distress: simulation-based evaluation of GHQ-30.
    Stochl J; Böhnke JR; Pickett KE; Croudace TJ
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 51(6):895-906. PubMed ID: 26687370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental manipulation of NEO-PI-R items.
    Haigler ED; Widiger TA
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct; 77(2):339-58. PubMed ID: 11693863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiently measuring dimensions of the externalizing spectrum model: Development of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory-Computerized Adaptive Test (ESI-CAT).
    Sunderland M; Slade T; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Patrick CJ; Kramer MD
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jul; 29(7):868-880. PubMed ID: 27841446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria.
    Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations.
    O'Neill T; Lunz ME; Thiede K
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 12029175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized Adaptive Diagnosis and Testing of Mental Health Disorders.
    Gibbons RD; Weiss DJ; Frank E; Kupfer D
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2016; 12():83-104. PubMed ID: 26651865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing balance function in patients with stroke.
    Hsueh IP; Chen JH; Wang CH; Chen CT; Sheu CF; Wang WC; Hou WH; Hsieh CL
    Phys Ther; 2010 Sep; 90(9):1336-44. PubMed ID: 20592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
    Kurtz JE; Parrish CL
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Apr; 76(2):315-32. PubMed ID: 11393463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.