These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11152128)

  • 1. Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.
    Petrey D; Honig B
    Protein Sci; 2000 Nov; 9(11):2181-91. PubMed ID: 11152128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
    Dominy BN; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation.
    Lazaridis T; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 1999 May; 288(3):477-87. PubMed ID: 10329155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discrimination of near-native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions.
    Gatchell DW; Dennis S; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2000 Dec; 41(4):518-34. PubMed ID: 11056039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
    Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
    Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model.
    Vorobjev YN; Almagro JC; Hermans J
    Proteins; 1998 Sep; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models.
    Novotný J; Rashin AA; Bruccoleri RE
    Proteins; 1988; 4(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 3186690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
    Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function.
    Narang P; Bhushan K; Bose S; Jayaram B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2006 Feb; 23(4):385-406. PubMed ID: 16363875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulating the folding of small proteins by use of the local minimum energy and the free solvation energy yields native-like structures.
    Brasseur R
    J Mol Graph; 1995 Oct; 13(5):312-22. PubMed ID: 8603060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TOUCHSTONE II: a new approach to ab initio protein structure prediction.
    Zhang Y; Kolinski A; Skolnick J
    Biophys J; 2003 Aug; 85(2):1145-64. PubMed ID: 12885659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical solvation models in the context of conformational energy searches: application to bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.
    Williams RL; Vila J; Perrot G; Scheraga HA
    Proteins; 1992 Sep; 14(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 1384032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.
    Park B; Levitt M
    J Mol Biol; 1996 May; 258(2):367-92. PubMed ID: 8627632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Sep; 252(3):351-65. PubMed ID: 7563056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct role of hydration water in protein misfolding and aggregation revealed by fluctuating thermodynamics analysis.
    Chong SH; Ham S
    Acc Chem Res; 2015 Apr; 48(4):956-65. PubMed ID: 25844814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new computational model for protein folding based on atomic solvation.
    Wang Y; Zhang H; Scott RA
    Protein Sci; 1995 Jul; 4(7):1402-11. PubMed ID: 7670381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.