These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Otoplasty: results after anterior versus posterior approach]. Echarri San Martín R; Hernando Cuñado M; Montojo Woodeson J; Plaza Mayor G Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2011; 62(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 21295762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effective scoring of scapha prevents helix irregularity in prominent ear correction - a biomechanical study. Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Shimizu Y; Kasai S; Kishi K; Kaneko T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):711-7. PubMed ID: 21839646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effectiveness of modified method for cup ear deformity]. Liu Q; You X; Zhang J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1482-5. PubMed ID: 23316641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finesse in otoplasty in four steps. Ribeiro JA; da Silva GS Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):846-52. PubMed ID: 22678134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical Otoplasty: An Evidence-Based Approach to Prominent Ears Correction. Stewart KJ; Lancerotto L Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2018 Feb; 26(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 29153192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Discussion: A novel method of naturally contouring the reconstructed ear: modified antihelix complex affixed to grooved base frame. Park C Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 May; 133(5):1175-1177. PubMed ID: 24776549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. One size fits all: a surgical technique for the correction of all types of prominent ears. Chait L; Nicholson R Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jul; 104(1):190-5; discussion 196-7. PubMed ID: 10597695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Aesthetic reconstruction of the auricle. Sclafani AP; Mashkevich G Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2006 May; 14(2):103-16, vi. PubMed ID: 16750768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Otoplasty with an unusual cartilage scoring approach. Gümüş N; Yılmaz S J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2016; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 26176319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Otoplasty: a comparison of techniques for antihelical defects treatment. Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D; Del Gaudio GA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):462-5. PubMed ID: 15029454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamometric Analysis of Normative Auricular Stiffness and Comparison With Operated Prominent Ears. Ozturan O; Dogan R; Ozucer B; Yildirim YS; Meric A J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2155-9. PubMed ID: 26468801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Stahl's ear correction: synergistic use of cartilage abrading, strategic Mustarde suture placement, and anterior anticonvexity suture. Weinfeld AB J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):901-5. PubMed ID: 22565922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of prominent and constricted ear anomalies. Janz BA; Cole P; Hollier LH; Stal S Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Jul; 124(1 Suppl):27e-37e. PubMed ID: 19568137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Combined otoplasty technique: chondrocutaneous conchal resection as the cornerstone to correction of the prominent ear. Bauer BS; Song DH; Aitken ME Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(4):1033-40; discussion 1041. PubMed ID: 12198413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]