These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11152830)

  • 1. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the NIR stent to the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.
    Baim DS; Cutlip DE; O'Shaughnessy CD; Hermiller JB; Kereiakes DJ; Giambartolomei A; Katz S; Lansky AJ; Fitzpatrick M; Popma JJ; Ho KK; Leon MB; Kuntz RE;
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 87(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11152830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Final results of a randomized trial comparing the MULTI-LINK stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent for narrowings in native coronary arteries.
    Baim DS; Cutlip DE; Midei M; Linnemeier TJ; Schreiber T; Cox D; Kereiakes D; Popma JJ; Robertson L; Prince R; Lansky AJ; Ho KK; Kuntz RE;
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jan; 87(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 11152831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The PARAGON stent study: a randomized trial of a new martensitic nitinol stent versus the Palmaz-Schatz stent for treatment of complex native coronary arterial lesions.
    Holmes DR; Lansky A; Kuntz R; Bell MR; Buchbinder M; Fortuna R; O'Shaughnessy CD; Popma J
    Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(10):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11074202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of immediate and follow-up results of the short and long NIR stent with the Palmaz-Schatz stent.
    Kobayashi Y; De Gregorio J; Kobayashi N; Reimers B; Albiero R; Vaghetti M; Finci L; Di Mario C; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 84(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 10482144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low restenosis rate of the NIR coronary stent: results of the Danish multicenter stent study (DANSTENT)--a randomized trial comparing a first-generation stent with a second-generation stent.
    Jørgensen E; Kelbaek H; Helqvist S; Jensen GV; Saunamäki K; Kastrup J; Madsen JK; Kløvgaard L; Thuesen L; Villadsen A; van Weert AW; Reiber JH;
    Am Heart J; 2003 Feb; 145(2):e5. PubMed ID: 12595860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of GR-II stent and Palmaz-Schatz stent for elective treatment of coronary stenoses.
    Lansky AJ; Roubin GS; O'Shaughnessy CD; Moore PB; Dean LS; Raizner AE; Safian RD; Zidar JP; Kerr JL; Popma JJ; Mehran R; Kuntz RE; Leon MB
    Circulation; 2000 Sep; 102(12):1364-8. PubMed ID: 10993853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.
    Foley DP; Melkert R; Umans VA; de Jaegere PP; Strikwerda S; de Feyter PJ; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 1995 Oct; 16(10):1331-46. PubMed ID: 8746901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Difference in security of stent jail between Palmaz-Schatz, NIR, and Multi-Link stents: the effect of balloon inflation through stent struts.
    Kinoshita T; Kobayashi Y; De Gregorio J; Nameki M; Kuroda N; Yamamoto Y; Miyazaki A; Masuda Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Oct; 48(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 10506788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for obstructed coronary bypass grafts. Saphenous Vein De Novo Trial Investigators.
    Savage MP; Douglas JS; Fischman DL; Pepine CJ; King SB; Werner JA; Bailey SR; Overlie PA; Fenton SH; Brinker JA; Leon MB; Goldberg S
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Sep; 337(11):740-7. PubMed ID: 9287229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group.
    Erbel R; Haude M; Höpp HW; Franzen D; Rupprecht HJ; Heublein B; Fischer K; de Jaegere P; Serruys P; Rutsch W; Probst P
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Dec; 339(23):1672-8. PubMed ID: 9834304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty vs coronary stenting for small vessels (LASMAL): immediate and long-term results.
    Rodriguez A; Rodríguez Alemparte M; Fernández Pereira C; Sampaolesi A; da Rocha Loures Bueno R; Vigo F; Obregón A; Palacios IF;
    Am J Med; 2005 Jul; 118(7):743-51. PubMed ID: 15989908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and angiographic outcome of NIR stent implantation in small vessels with unfavorable lesion morphology.
    Miketic ; Carlsson J; Tebbe U
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 May; 11(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 10745529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SMART: The microstent's ability to limit restenosis trial.
    Heuser R; Lopez A; Kuntz R; Reduto L; Badger R; Coleman P; Whitlow P; Iannone LA; Safian R; Yeung A; Moses J;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Mar; 52(3):269-77; discussion 278. PubMed ID: 11246234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of results of intracoronary implantation of the Plamaz-Schatz stent with conventional balloon angioplasty in chronic total coronary arterial occlusion.
    Mori M; Kurogane H; Hayashi T; Yasaka Y; Ohta S; Kajiya T; Takarada A; Yoshida A; Matsuda Y; Nakagawa K; Murata T; Yoshida Y; Yokoyama M
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 78(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 8916475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety and efficacy of angiography-guided stent placement in small native coronary arteries of < 3.0 mm in diameter.
    Lau KW; He Q; Ding ZP; Johan A
    Clin Cardiol; 1997 Aug; 20(8):711-6. PubMed ID: 9259164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.
    Grines CL; Cox DA; Stone GW; Garcia E; Mattos LA; Giambartolomei A; Brodie BR; Madonna O; Eijgelshoven M; Lansky AJ; O'Neill WW; Morice MC
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Dec; 341(26):1949-56. PubMed ID: 10607811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized comparison of J&J Crown stent versus NIR stent after routine coronary angioplasty.
    Miketic S; Carlsson J; Tebbe U
    Am Heart J; 2001 Nov; 142(5):E8. PubMed ID: 11685183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial.
    Morice MC; Colombo A; Meier B; Serruys P; Tamburino C; Guagliumi G; Sousa E; Stoll HP;
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(8):895-904. PubMed ID: 16493102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial.
    Stone GW; Ellis SG; O'Shaughnessy CD; Martin SL; Satler L; McGarry T; Turco MA; Kereiakes DJ; Kelley L; Popma JJ; Russell ME;
    JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(11):1253-63. PubMed ID: 16531618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised comparison of Micro Stent I with Palmaz-Schatz stent placement for the elective treatment of short coronary stenoses.
    Menafoglio A; Eeckhout E; Debbas N; Faivre R; Petiteau PY; Vogt P; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Apr; 43(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 9554765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.