188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11153008)
1. Comparison of strength properties of poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 and polyglyconate (Maxon) sutures: in vitro, in the subcutis, and in the achilles tendon of rabbits.
Kangas J; Paasimaa S; Mäkelä P; Leppilahti J; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
J Biomed Mater Res; 2001; 58(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 11153008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histomorphometric analysis of poly-L/D-lactide 96/4 sutures in the gastrocnemius tendon of rabbits.
Kangas J; Pajala A; Leppilahti J; Ryhänen J; Länsman S; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
Int J Artif Organs; 2006 Sep; 29(9):893-9. PubMed ID: 17033997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 triple-stranded bound suture in the modified Kessler repair: an ex vivo static and cyclic tensile testing study in a porcine extensor tendon model.
Viinikainen AK; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Törmälä P; Rokkanen P
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1963-9. PubMed ID: 19437105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Material and knot properties of braided polyester (Ticron) and bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 sutures.
Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Huovinen K; Kellomäki M; Törmälä P; Rokkanen P
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Feb; 17(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 16502250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexor tendon healing within the tendon sheath using bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide 96/4 suture. A histological in vivo study with rabbits.
Viinikainen A; Göransson H; Taskinen HS; Röyttä M; Kellomäki M; Törmälä P; Rokkanen P
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2014 May; 25(5):1319-25. PubMed ID: 24477875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of biodegradable polycaprolactone film as an internal fixation material to enhance tendon repair: an in vitro study.
Hu JZ; Zhou YC; Huang LH; Lu HB
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Aug; 14():246. PubMed ID: 23957758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of the simple running and cross-stitch epitenon sutures in achilles tendon repairs.
Shepard ME; Lindsey DP; Chou LB
Foot Ankle Int; 2008 May; 29(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 18510906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical testing of epitenon suture strength in Achilles tendon repairs.
Shepard ME; Lindsey DP; Chou LB
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Oct; 28(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 17923058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of fibrin sealant on the strength of tendon repair of full thickness tendon lacerations in the rabbit Achilles tendon.
Lusardi DA; Cain JE
J Foot Ankle Surg; 1994; 33(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 7849667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Suture Types and Techniques in Achilles Tendon Repair: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Animal Experiment.
Dogar F; Gurbuz K; Topak D; Ozdemir MA; Kuşçu B; Ekinci Y; Batin S; Yaykasli H; Bilal O
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2024; 114(2):. PubMed ID: 36256593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of a knotless barbed suture repair in a human Achilles tendon rupture model.
Kanz BN; Morris RP; Lewis T; Panchbhavi VK
Foot Ankle Spec; 2014 Jun; 7(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 24686909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture holding capacity of the Achilles tendon during the healing period: an in vivo experimental study in rabbits.
Yildirim Y; Kara H; Cabukoglu C; Esemenli T
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Feb; 27(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 16487465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of new Achilles tendon rupture repair technique the "Giftbox" versus the Krackow technique in New Zealand white rabbits: An experimental animal study.
Hashim MH; Teo SH; Al-Fayyadh MZM; Mappiare S; Ng WM; Ali MRM
Injury; 2022 Feb; 53(2):393-398. PubMed ID: 34740441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a membrane of poly (L-co-D,L lactic acid-co-trimethylene carbonate) with aloe vera: An alternative biomaterial designed to improve skin healing.
Komatsu D; Mistura DV; Motta A; Domingues JA; Hausen MA; Duek E
J Biomater Appl; 2017 Sep; 32(3):311-320. PubMed ID: 28707999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
