243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11154534)
1. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used in the treatment of compression fracture.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Scribner RM; Reiley ME; Talmadge K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11154534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty with different bone cements.
Tomita S; Molloy S; Jasper LE; Abe M; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1203-7. PubMed ID: 15167659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.
Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Phillips FM; Magovern B; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Zindrick MR; Hadjipavlou AG; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15653084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An ex vivo evaluation of an inflatable bone tamp used to reduce fractures within vertebral bodies under load.
Belkoff SM; Jasper LE; Stevens SS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):1640-3. PubMed ID: 12163725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Reduction Achieved by Inflatable Bone Tamps Under Simulated Physiological Load.
Gordon M; Peppelman WC; Beutler W; OʼHalloran D; Chinthakunta SR; Bucklen B
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Feb; 30(1):E31-E37. PubMed ID: 28107240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanics of vertebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1537-41. PubMed ID: 11462082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of an Outer Sleeve on an Inflatable Balloon Tamp in Terms of Height Restoration Under Simulated Physiological Load.
Peppelman WC; Beutler W; Gordon M; Chintakunta SR; O'Halloran D; Bucklen B
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Apr; 30(3):E211-E218. PubMed ID: 28323702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial outcome and efficacy of "kyphoplasty" in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
Lieberman IH; Dudeney S; Reinhardt MK; Bell G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1631-8. PubMed ID: 11464159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with kyphoplasty.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Deramond H; Jasper LE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2001; 22(6):1212-6. PubMed ID: 11415923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of a hydroxyapatite cement for use with vertebroplasty.
Belkoff SM; Mathis JM; Jasper LE; Deramond H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1542-6. PubMed ID: 11462083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertebral body stenting: a new method for vertebral augmentation versus kyphoplasty.
Rotter R; Martin H; Fuerderer S; Gabl M; Roeder C; Heini P; Mittlmeier T
Eur Spine J; 2010 Jun; 19(6):916-23. PubMed ID: 20191393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
Phillips FM; Todd Wetzel F; Lieberman I; Campbell-Hupp M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(19):2173-8; discussion 2178-9. PubMed ID: 12394934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: biomechanical behavior under repetitive loading conditions.
Kim MJ; Lindsey DP; Hannibal M; Alamin TF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2079-84. PubMed ID: 16915092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of the vertebral jack tool and the inflatable bone tamp for reduction of osteoporotic spine fractures.
Sietsma MS; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot NJ; Aalsma AM; Veldhuizen AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E640-4. PubMed ID: 19680089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
