207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11155470)
1. [NMR cholangiography in the diagnostic algorithm of candidates to video laparocholecystectomy].
Puglisi F; Magialetti A; Carriero A; Capuano F; De Fazio M; Verzillo F; Martines G; Simone M
Minerva Chir; 2000 Sep; 55(9):581-5. PubMed ID: 11155470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.
Ghazal AH; Sorour MA; El-Riwini M; El-Bahrawy H
Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 19481184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The value of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the expedient diagnosis of choledocholithiasis].
Mussack T; Ladurner R; Rock C; Trupka A; Gross M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2002 Apr; 127(15):786-90. PubMed ID: 11951135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis.
Menezes N; Marson LP; debeaux AC; Muir IM; Auld CD
Br J Surg; 2000 Sep; 87(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 10971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Mofidi R; Lee AC; Madhavan KK; Garden OJ; Parks RW
Pancreatology; 2008; 8(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18253063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Dwerryhouse SJ; Brown E; Vipond MN
Br J Surg; 1998 Oct; 85(10):1364-6. PubMed ID: 9782014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Zfass AM
Gastroenterologist; 1998 Mar; 6(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 9531120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: sensitive and specific diagnostic method for suspected choledolithiasis].
Leytens JW; van Proosdij MP; Koster K; Schattenkerk ME; Ziedses des Plantes BG; Hazenberg HJ; Eddes EH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Mar; 145(10):478-82. PubMed ID: 11268911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of choledocholithiasis in the era of laparoscopic surgery.
Hawasli A; Lloyd L; Cacucci B
Am Surg; 2000 May; 66(5):425-30; discussion 430-1. PubMed ID: 10824741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The role of ERCP in qualifying patients for cholecystectomy in the age of the modern biliary tract imaging].
Jarosław B; Stanisław W; Agnieszka W; Ewa S; Piotr T; Edward S
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 May; 22(131):474-6. PubMed ID: 17679399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US.
Moon JH; Cho YD; Cha SW; Cheon YK; Ahn HC; Kim YS; Kim YS; Lee JS; Lee MS; Lee HK; Shim CS; Kim BS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
Alcaraz MJ; De la Morena EJ; Polo A; Ramos A; De la Cal MA; González Mandly A
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical impact of MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease.
Filippone A; Ambrosini R; Fuschi M; Marinelli T; Pinto D; Maggialetti A
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):27-35. PubMed ID: 12700542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography].
Basile L; Pezzoto C; Roubicek D; Tempra A; Laborda Molteni J
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2000; 30(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 11144943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ["Sequential" treatment: is it the best alternative in cholecysto-choledochal lithiasis?].
Nardi M; Perri SG; Pietrangeli F; Amendolara M; Dalla Torre A; Gabbrielli F; Nicita A; Lotti R; Piacentini F; Citone G
Chir Ital; 2002; 54(6):785-98. PubMed ID: 12613326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
