313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11155648)
41. Congress did the right thing.
Shirazi S
Iowa Med; 1999; 89(6):5. PubMed ID: 10590582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Emergency care under managed care: a fatal distraction?
Henry GL
Health Syst Rev; 1996; 29(2):55-6, 58, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10156521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Accountability for HMOs.
Ortolon K
Tex Nurs; 1997 Oct; 71(9):4-6, 11. PubMed ID: 9416241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Clinton's regulations may be model for patient-rights legislative push.
Levin-Epstein M
Manag Care; 2001 Jan; 10(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 11211323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Perspectives. States, courts inch forward on HMO liability while conferees' debate nears.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1999 Nov; 53(43):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10623024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Patient's Bill of Rights Act 1998.
Fisher PS
ORL Head Neck Nurs; 1999; 17(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10690125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Consumers' choice.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Mar; 100(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 15146762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Avoiding 'bad faith' denials of medical claims.
Quinn C
Manag Care; 1997 Apr; 6(4):79-80, 83-5. PubMed ID: 10167004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The battle continues. Congress still wrestling with competing patients' rights bills.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2001 Jul; 97(7):30-3. PubMed ID: 11481793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Evolving tension between HMO liability precedent and legislation.
Mansfield NR; Gabel JT; Jablow LB
Tort Insur Law J; 2001; 36(4):949-78. PubMed ID: 11939226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Demanding better access: parity is not a luxury item for children and families.
Faenza MM
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1999 Aug; 8(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 10557688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Arbitration gains favor as a way to cut legal costs.
Moskowitz DB
J Am Health Care; 1994; 4(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 10142806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Managed care in the courtroom.
Gemignani J
State Health Care Am; 2001; ():28-31. PubMed ID: 11521319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. What's best for the patient?
Waller D
Time; 2001 Jul; 157(26):24-8. PubMed ID: 11447815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Avoiding the pitfalls of capitation and other HMO-physician provider agreements.
Finney LD
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1996 Jan; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 10158208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Controversial Patient Rights Bill set for contentious conference.
SoRelle R
Circulation; 2001 Aug; 104(7):E9011-3. PubMed ID: 11505952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The Patient's Bill of Rights and access to physicians.
Pritzker J
Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):77-8. PubMed ID: 11155652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Criminal prosecution for HMO treatment denial.
Humbach JA
Health Matrix Clevel; 2001; 11(1):147-87. PubMed ID: 11345674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. A review of Maryland insurance law.
Littman B
Md Med; 2001; 2(2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11398493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Perspectives. External appeals touted as consumer confidence builder and liability shield.
Cunningham R
Med Health; 1998 Jun; 52(22):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10179411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
