82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11155763)
1. [Broadening our visibility and dissemination].
Ryder E
Invest Clin; 2000 Dec; 41(4):217-8. PubMed ID: 11155763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The impact factor].
Svacina P
Vnitr Lek; 2002 Aug; 48(8):693-4. PubMed ID: 12472111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Nursing publications in Spain].
Gálvez Toro A
Rev Enferm; 2001 May; 24(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 12033042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To each citation, a purpose.
Von Bartheld CS; Collin SP; Güntürkün O
Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5910):36-7. PubMed ID: 19119199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. From the editor-in-chief.
Miles A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 16(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 20367809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Literature citations in the Internet era.
Gingras Y; Larivière V; Archambault E
Science; 2009 Jan; 323(5910):36; author reply 37-8. PubMed ID: 19119197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Revista Española de Cardiología 2006: activity, readership, and scientific impact].
Alfonso F; Segovia J; Heras M; Bermejo J
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1339-44. PubMed ID: 17697667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Most-downloaded abstracts and full-text views in 2005: a top-12 survey.
Acta Radiol; 2006 Dec; 47(10):1005-6. PubMed ID: 17134999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Why is it that Argentinean hepatologists do not publish enough?].
Villamil FG
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2008 Mar; 38(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 18533351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Closing remark to this year's discussion on the significance of impact factor for the evaluation of publication activity].
Spála M
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 17323624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact factor of scientific journals.
Marziale MH; Mendes IA
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2002; 10(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 12592845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?
Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):677-8. PubMed ID: 17386274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-authors' self-citation: a further impact factor bias?
Sala SD; Brooks J
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1139-45. PubMed ID: 18708185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The shifting sands of serials bibliography: titles using the term "peptide".
Jones JH
J Pept Sci; 2006 Aug; 12(8):503-4. PubMed ID: 16847998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Occupational medicine and the impact factor].
Magnavita N
Med Lav; 2001; 92(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 11367830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The impact factor and the grantee].
Ploin PF; Chatellier G
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1996 Dec; 89(12):1589-90. PubMed ID: 9137723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sociology. Survey finds citations growing narrower as journals move online.
Couzin J
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5887):329. PubMed ID: 18635769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. On the common growth of the European association of urology annual meeting and of European urology, "your" platinum journal.
Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):585-7. PubMed ID: 17187922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [There is nothing better than impact factor and citation rate].
Svacina S
Cas Lek Cesk; 2006; 145(12):966; discussion 967. PubMed ID: 17323623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [A letter to myself].
Pérez-Castro Ellendt E
Arch Esp Urol; 2005 Jun; 58(5):383-4. PubMed ID: 16078778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]