These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11155841)

  • 1. Assessing medical technologies in development. A new paradigm of medical technology assessment.
    Hummel MJ; van Rossum W; Verkerke GJ; Rakhorst G
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(4):1214-9. PubMed ID: 11155841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical technology assessment: the use of the analytic hierarchy process as a tool for multidisciplinary evaluation of medical devices.
    Hummel JM; van Rossum W; Verkerke GJ; Rakhorst G
    Int J Artif Organs; 2000 Nov; 23(11):782-7. PubMed ID: 11132023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technology's next test. Regional systems laying groundwork for post-reform technology planning.
    Taylor KS
    Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Jun; 67(11):42-4. PubMed ID: 8499965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.
    Gallego G; Fowler S; van Gool K
    Aust Health Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(3):520-7. PubMed ID: 18666881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caring communications: how technology enhances interpersonal relations, Part II.
    Simpson RL
    Nurs Adm Q; 2008; 32(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 18360212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interests in health care technology assessment (HCTA) and HCTA training needs in eight European countries: COMETT-ASSESS.
    Szczepura A; Kankaanpää J
    Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1679-88. PubMed ID: 8047927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare.
    May C; Mort M; Williams T; Mair F; Gask L
    Soc Sci Med; 2003 Aug; 57(4):697-710. PubMed ID: 12821017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health technology assessment in Australia: a need to re-focus.
    Hailey DM
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1996 Sep; 16(3):123-9. PubMed ID: 8887855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the AHP methodology in system dynamics: Modelling and simulation for health technology assessments to determine the correct prosthesis choice for hernia diseases.
    Improta G; Russo MA; Triassi M; Converso G; Murino T; Santillo LC
    Math Biosci; 2018 May; 299():19-27. PubMed ID: 29518403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Technology assessment in health care: methodological and operational questions].
    Krauss-Silva L
    Cad Saude Publica; 2004; 20 Suppl 2():S199-207. PubMed ID: 15608934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technology's implications for health care quality. A clinical engineering perspective.
    Rosow E; Grimes SL
    Nurs Adm Q; 2003; 27(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 14649022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The critical role of research evidence in the framework of health technology assessment].
    Sauerland S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Mar; 49(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 16477456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
    Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
    Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unmet needs: relevance to medical technology innovation?
    McCarthy AD; Sproson L; Wells O; Tindale W
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):382-7. PubMed ID: 26415684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-Oriented Health Technology Assessment: One Step Forward in Supporting the Decision-Making Process in Hospitals.
    Ritrovato M; Faggiano FC; Tedesco G; Derrico P
    Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 26091605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new NICE Evaluation Pathway for medical technologies.
    Campbell B
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Jul; 92(5):435-6. PubMed ID: 20653073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology framework. A system's five-phase approach integrates values with vision.
    Stempien TL
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 10123572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.