BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11157859)

  • 1. Concomitant loss of chromosome 3 and whole arm losses and gains of chromosome 1, 6, or 8 in metastasizing primary uveal melanoma.
    Aalto Y; Eriksson L; Seregard S; Larsson O; Knuutila S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb; 42(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 11157859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of c-myc amplification in uveal melanoma by fluorescent in situ hybridization.
    Parrella P; Caballero OL; Sidransky D; Merbs SL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Jul; 42(8):1679-84. PubMed ID: 11431428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional deletion and amplification on chromosome 6 in a uveal melanoma case without abnormalities on chromosomes 1p, 3 and 8.
    van Gils W; Kilic E; Brüggenwirth HT; Vaarwater J; Verbiest MM; Beverloo B; van Til-Berg ME; Paridaens D; Luyten GP; de Klein A
    Melanoma Res; 2008 Feb; 18(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18227702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and cytogenetic analyses in uveal melanoma.
    Kilic E; van Gils W; Lodder E; Beverloo HB; van Til ME; Mooy CM; Paridaens D; de Klein A; Luyten GP
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Sep; 47(9):3703-7. PubMed ID: 16936076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic changes in colorectal carcinoma tumors with liver metastases analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and DNA ploidy.
    Nakao K; Shibusawa M; Ishihara A; Yoshizawa H; Tsunoda A; Kusano M; Kurose A; Makita T; Sasaki K
    Cancer; 2001 Feb; 91(4):721-6. PubMed ID: 11241239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of complex chromosomal abnormalities in uveal melanoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Naus NC; van Drunen E; de Klein A; Luyten GP; Paridaens DA; Alers JC; Ksander BR; Beverloo HB; Slater RM
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Mar; 30(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 11170284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of archival uveal melanoma with known clinical outcome.
    Mensink HW; Kiliç E; Vaarwater J; Douben H; Paridaens D; de Klein A
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Mar; 181(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 18295662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chromosomal gains and losses in uveal melanomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Speicher MR; Prescher G; du Manoir S; Jauch A; Horsthemke B; Bornfeld N; Becher R; Cremer T
    Cancer Res; 1994 Jul; 54(14):3817-23. PubMed ID: 8033101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic heterogeneity in uveal melanoma assessed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Dopierala J; Damato BE; Lake SL; Taktak AF; Coupland SE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Oct; 51(10):4898-905. PubMed ID: 20484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of specific chromosome alterations with tumour phenotype in posterior uveal melanoma.
    Sisley K; Parsons MA; Garnham J; Potter AM; Curtis D; Rees RC; Rennie IG
    Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 10646885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic profiling and identification of high-risk uveal melanoma by array CGH analysis of primary tumors and liver metastases.
    Trolet J; Hupé P; Huon I; Lebigot I; Decraene C; Delattre O; Sastre-Garau X; Saule S; Thiéry JP; Plancher C; Asselain B; Desjardins L; Mariani P; Piperno-Neumann S; Barillot E; Couturier J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2572-80. PubMed ID: 19151381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Higher percentage of FISH-determined monosomy 3 and 8q amplification in uveal melanoma cells relate to poor patient prognosis.
    van den Bosch T; van Beek JG; Vaarwater J; Verdijk RM; Naus NC; Paridaens D; de Klein A; Kiliç E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 May; 53(6):2668-74. PubMed ID: 22427574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Allelotype of posterior uveal melanoma: implications for a bifurcated tumor progression pathway.
    Parrella P; Sidransky D; Merbs SL
    Cancer Res; 1999 Jul; 59(13):3032-7. PubMed ID: 10397238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Naus NC; Verhoeven AC; van Drunen E; Slater R; Mooy CM; Paridaens DA; Luyten GP; de Klein A
    Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Feb; 8(2):534-9. PubMed ID: 11839674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A copy number gain of the 6p arm is linked with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an array-based comparative genomic hybridization study.
    Chochi Y; Kawauchi S; Nakao M; Furuya T; Hashimoto K; Oga A; Oka M; Sasaki K
    J Pathol; 2009 Apr; 217(5):677-84. PubMed ID: 19097070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct chromosomal aberrations in sinonasal mucosal melanoma as detected by comparative genomic hybridization.
    van Dijk M; Sprenger S; Rombout P; Marres H; Kaanders J; Jeuken J; Ruiter D
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Feb; 36(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 12508243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
    Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
    Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interphase cytogenetics of prostatic tumor progression: specific chromosomal abnormalities are involved in metastasis to the bone.
    Alers JC; Krijtenburg PJ; Rosenberg C; Hop WC; Verkerk AM; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH; Bosman FT; van Dekken H
    Lab Invest; 1997 Nov; 77(5):437-48. PubMed ID: 9389787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome.
    Namiki T; Yanagawa S; Izumo T; Ishikawa M; Tachibana M; Kawakami Y; Yokozeki H; Nishioka K; Kaneko Y
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Feb; 157(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15676140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies novel rearrangements of chromosomes 6, 15, and 18 in primary uveal melanoma.
    Sisley K; Tattersall N; Dyson M; Smith K; Mudhar HS; Rennie IG
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Sep; 83(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 16684523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.