These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
30. A variable aperture fluoroscopic unit for reduced patient exposure. Rossi RP; Wesenberg RL; Hendee WR Radiology; 1978 Dec; 129(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 725062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A digital fluoroscopic imaging system for verification during external beam radiotherapy]. Takai M Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 2247353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images. Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure. Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The economic expediency of digital fluorography]. Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM Med Tekh; 1999; (5):41-4. PubMed ID: 10560099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy. Wang J; Blackburn TJ Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients. Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantification of fluoroscopic imaging system contrast by using video waveform monitoring. Taubel JP; Schueler BA; Vrieze TJ; Gray JE Radiographics; 2001; 21(2):507-18. PubMed ID: 11259712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance evaluation of a prototype high resolution digital radiographic/near real-time fluoroscopic computerized tomographic system for radiotherapy simulation. Atari NA; Zwicker RD; Schmidt-Ullrich RK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 May; 32(2):421-36. PubMed ID: 7751184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of a television digital noise reduction device on fluoroscopic image quality and dose rate. Jaffe CC; Orphanoudakis SC; Ablow RC Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):789-92. PubMed ID: 7111727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]