These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11158657)

  • 21. Digital spot-film fluorography.
    Morgan D
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Jul; 56(638):9-11. PubMed ID: 2222795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An added quality-control measurement for fluoroscopic x-ray systems.
    Miller KL; Stoltzfus WR; Latshaw RF
    Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):518-9. PubMed ID: 7255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study.
    Chida K; Saito H; Zuguchi M; Shirotori K; Kumagai S; Nakayama H; Matsubara K; Kohzuki M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1111-4. PubMed ID: 15385315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Methods and devices for low-dose digital fluorography].
    Kanter BM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 10560088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient-specific region-of-interest fluoroscopy device for X-ray dose reduction.
    Xu T; Le HQ; Molloi S
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):585-92. PubMed ID: 12563159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fluoroscopic and fluorographic cameras.
    Balter S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Mar; 46(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 10348143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.
    Mahesh M
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(4):1033-45. PubMed ID: 11452079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A variable aperture fluoroscopic unit for reduced patient exposure.
    Rossi RP; Wesenberg RL; Hendee WR
    Radiology; 1978 Dec; 129(3):799-802. PubMed ID: 725062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [A digital fluoroscopic imaging system for verification during external beam radiotherapy].
    Takai M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 2247353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Objective performance measurements versus perceived image quality in intensified fluoroscopic or photospot images.
    Gould RG; Belanger B; Goldberg HI; Moss A
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):783-8. PubMed ID: 7444062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The economic expediency of digital fluorography].
    Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):41-4. PubMed ID: 10560099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.
    Wang J; Blackburn TJ
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
    Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
    Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantification of fluoroscopic imaging system contrast by using video waveform monitoring.
    Taubel JP; Schueler BA; Vrieze TJ; Gray JE
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(2):507-18. PubMed ID: 11259712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance evaluation of a prototype high resolution digital radiographic/near real-time fluoroscopic computerized tomographic system for radiotherapy simulation.
    Atari NA; Zwicker RD; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 May; 32(2):421-36. PubMed ID: 7751184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of a television digital noise reduction device on fluoroscopic image quality and dose rate.
    Jaffe CC; Orphanoudakis SC; Ablow RC
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):789-92. PubMed ID: 7111727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.