These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Genomics: an in vitro toxicology point of view. Corvi R Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():129-31. PubMed ID: 12513664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signal transduction pathway. Denison MS; Rogers JM; Rushing SR; Jones CL; Tetangco SC; Heath-Pagliuso S Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2002 May; Chapter 4():Unit4.8. PubMed ID: 20945300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toxicogenomics; transcript profiling and potential application to chemical allergy. Pennie WD; Kimber I Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Jun; 16(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 12020605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted salmon gene array (SalArray): a toxicogenomic tool for gene expression profiling of interactions between estrogen and aryl hydrocarbon receptor signalling pathways. Mortensen AS; Arukwe A Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Mar; 20(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 17291011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of toxicogenomics to toxicology: basic concepts in the analysis of microarray data. Irwin RD; Boorman GA; Cunningham ML; Heinloth AN; Malarkey DE; Paules RS Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32 Suppl 1():72-83. PubMed ID: 15209406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ah receptor in mice genetically "nonresponsive" for cytochrome P4501A1 induction: cytosolic Ah receptor, transformation to the nuclear binding state, and induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase by halogenated and nonhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons in embryonic tissues and cells. Harper PA; Golas CL; Okey AB Mol Pharmacol; 1991 Nov; 40(5):818-26. PubMed ID: 1658612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of proteomics in toxicology: identification of biomarkers of toxicity by protein expression analysis. Kennedy S Biomarkers; 2002; 7(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 12171755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toxicogenomics concepts and applications to study hepatic effects of food additives and chemicals. Stierum R; Heijne W; Kienhuis A; van Ommen B; Groten J Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):179-88. PubMed ID: 16139318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of end points relevant to detection of potentially adverse drug reactions. Hellmold H; Nilsson CB; Schuppe-Koistinen I; Kenne K; Wärngård L Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):239-43. PubMed ID: 12052663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knockout of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor results in distinct hepatic and renal phenotypes in rats and mice. Harrill JA; Hukkanen RR; Lawson M; Martin G; Gilger B; Soldatow V; Lecluyse EL; Budinsky RA; Rowlands JC; Thomas RS Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):503-18. PubMed ID: 23859880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying toxic mechanisms using DNA microarrays: evidence that an experimental inhibitor of cell adhesion molecule expression signals through the aryl hydrocarbon nuclear receptor. Waring JF; Gum R; Morfitt D; Jolly RA; Ciurlionis R; Heindel M; Gallenberg L; Buratto B; Ulrich RG Toxicology; 2002 Dec; 181-182():537-50. PubMed ID: 12505364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Toxicogenomics as a tool for evaluation of chemical effects]. Watanabe H Yakugaku Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1967-74. PubMed ID: 18057786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Allelic variants of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor differentially influence UVB-mediated skin inflammatory responses in SKH1 mice. Smith KJ; Murray IA; Boyer JA; Perdew GH Toxicology; 2018 Feb; 394():27-34. PubMed ID: 29197551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]