693 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11158712)
1. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.
van Och FM; Vandebriel RJ; Prinsen MK; De Jong WH; Slob W; van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2001 Oct; 167(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 11578800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.
Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone: an analysis using the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Dec; 41(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 10617213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.
Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10513674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses.
Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Dickens A; Briggs D; Pate I; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 10439340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data.
Griem P; Goebel C; Scheffler H
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Dec; 38(3):269-90. PubMed ID: 14623479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
