These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11158787)
1. Goldmann vs. Humphrey perimetry for occipital lobe lesions. Kuritzky S Ophthalmology; 2001 Feb; 108(2):242. PubMed ID: 11158787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Goldmann vs. Humphrey perimetry for occipital lobe lesions. Coyle JT Ophthalmology; 2001 Feb; 108(2):241-2. PubMed ID: 11158785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of tangent screen, goldmann, and humphrey perimetry in the detection and localization of occipital lesions. Wong AM; Sharpe JA Ophthalmology; 2000 Mar; 107(3):527-44. PubMed ID: 10711892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Representation of the visual field in the human occipital cortex: a magnetic resonance imaging and perimetric correlation. Wong AM; Sharpe JA Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Feb; 117(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 10037566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields. Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perimetry. Ellenberger C Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1977; 17(1):85-113. PubMed ID: 844961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Loss of stereopsis with optic chiasmal lesions and stereoscopic tests as a differential test. Hirai T; Ito Y; Arai M; Ota Y; Kojima T; Sato M; Miyake Y Ophthalmology; 2002 Sep; 109(9):1692-702. PubMed ID: 12208719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2. Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Mills RP Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1991; 31(4):51-70. PubMed ID: 1743895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical study of the visual field defects caused by occipital lobe lesions. Ogawa K; Ishikawa H; Suzuki Y; Oishi M; Kamei S Cerebrovasc Dis; 2014; 37(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 24435066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovery of visual-field defects after occipital lobe infarction: a perimetric study. Çelebisoy M; Çelebisoy N; Bayam E; Köse T J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2011 Jun; 82(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 20935321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of automated and manual perimetry in patients with blepharoptosis. Alniemi ST; Pang NK; Woog JJ; Bradley EA Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 23924985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Brusini P Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 130(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 11192559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Checkerboard Visual Field Defect in Occipital Stroke. Kamal S; Al Othman BA; Kini AT; Lee AG J Neuroophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 40(2):e13-e14. PubMed ID: 32028451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of evaluating the central visual field in occipital lobe lesions. Wall M Arch Neurol; 1985 Apr; 42(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 3985808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Oculokinetic perimetry for the assessment of visual fields. Clark BJ; Timms C; Franks WA Arch Dis Child; 1990 Apr; 65(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 2346336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chiasmal and Postchiasmal Disease. Moss HE Continuum (Minneap Minn); 2019 Oct; 25(5):1310-1328. PubMed ID: 31584539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of visual dysfunction in optic atrophy by functional magnetic resonance imaging during monocular visual stimulation. Miki A; Nakajima T; Takagi M; Shirakashi M; Abe H Am J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 122(3):404-15. PubMed ID: 8794713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]