These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11159168)

  • 1. Re: "Choosing a retrospective design to assess joint genetic and environmental contributions to risks".
    Amre D; Fortier I
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 153(2):205-6. PubMed ID: 11159168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Major Sources of Bias.
    Meuli L; Dick F
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 May; 55(5):736. PubMed ID: 29525740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental mediation and the twin design.
    Purcell S; Koenen KC
    Behav Genet; 2005 Jul; 35(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 15971029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fundamental errors in observed researches].
    Sørensen HT; Møller-Petersen J; Sabroe S; Vilstrup H
    Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 8139905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias in association studies resulting from gene-environment interactions and competing risks.
    Elbaz A; Alpérovitch A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 155(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 11821252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-group experimental designs.
    Brink PJ
    West J Nurs Res; 2003 Oct; 25(6):619-22. PubMed ID: 14528614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of body mass index.
    Honkanen L; Lesser GT
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Sep; 48(9):1172-3. PubMed ID: 10983925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Invited commentary: Rare side effects of obstetric interventions: are observational studies good enough?
    Buekens P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 153(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 11159153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: "Respiratory and irritant health effects of ambient volatile organic compounds: the Kanawha County Health Study".
    Collins JJ; Ramlow JM; Teta MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Jul; 140(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 8080522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confounding and effect modification: their significance in medical research.
    Olayinka BA
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Jan; 43(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 9185379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic association studies: from "searching under the lamppost" to "fishing in the pond".
    El-Serag HB; White DL; Mitra N
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Mar; 134(3):662-4. PubMed ID: 18325382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-control design: an appropriate strategy for nursing research.
    Polivka BJ; Nickel JT
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 1482502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint effect of genes and environment distorted by selection biases: implications for hospital-based case-control studies.
    Wacholder S; Chatterjee N; Hartge P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Sep; 11(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 12223433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What can we learn from interface pressure measurements?
    Fletcher J
    J Wound Care; 2001 Feb; 10(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 12964225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy?
    Jones C; Lyons C
    Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding Confounding in Observational Studies.
    Meuli L; Dick F
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 May; 55(5):737. PubMed ID: 29526654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competing risks for patients with localized prostate cancer.
    Seidenfeld J; Samson DJ; Albertsen PC
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(20):1498-9. PubMed ID: 17925533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.
    Soumerai SB; Starr D; Majumdar SR
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E101. PubMed ID: 26111157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.