These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11161152)

  • 1. Survey of conventional and spiral ct doses.
    Hidajat N; Wolf M; Nunnemann A; Liersch P; Gebauer B; Teichgräber U; Schröder RJ; Felix R
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 11161152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
    Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embryo dose estimates in body CT.
    Huda W; Randazzo W; Tipnis S; Frey GD; Mah E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):874-80. PubMed ID: 20308485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and patient dose in computed tomography examinations in Greece.
    Simantirakis G; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Dimitriou P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):129-32. PubMed ID: 21743078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
    Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional survey of CT dose indices in India.
    Livingstone RS; Dinakaran PM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 19687133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Dosimetry in conventional and spiral CT in 8 spiral CT scanners of the latest generation].
    Scheck RJ; Coppenrath EM; Kellner MW; Lehmann KJ; Mayer M; Rock C; Rieger J; Rothmeier L; Schweden F; Sokiranski R; Bäuml A; Hahn K
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):562-6. PubMed ID: 9687947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics.
    Hamberg LM; Rhea JT; Hunter GJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):762-72. PubMed ID: 12616020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose--comparison of four 16-section CT scanners.
    van der Molen AJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):208-16. PubMed ID: 17090713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT dose reduction using prospectively triggered or fast-pitch spiral technique employed in cardiothoracic imaging (the CT dose study).
    Chinnaiyan KM; Bilolikar AN; Walsh E; Wood D; DePetris A; Gentry R; Boura J; Abbara S; Al-Mallah M; Bis K; Boswell G; Gallagher M; Arunakul IO; Halliburton S; Jacobs J; Lesser J; Schoepf UJ; Valeti US; Raff GL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 24939069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose uniformity analysis among ten 16-slice same-model CT scanners.
    Erdi YE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 22261787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.
    Van der Molen AJ; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):248-55. PubMed ID: 17038410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Absorbed dose during helical acquisition CT. Effect of acquisition parameters].
    Giraud JY; Sage J; Taisant D; Dusserre A; Bolla M; Coulomb M; Kolodié H; Barthelemy R; Aumont B; Ferretti G
    J Radiol; 2001 Jan; 82(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 11223628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of tube voltage on CT noise levels in different phantom sizes.
    Karmazyn B; Liang Y; Klahr P; Jennings SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1001-5. PubMed ID: 23617481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of computed tomography dose index for clinical scans.
    Trevisan D; Ravanelli D; Valentini A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):389-98. PubMed ID: 24162372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A contribution to the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT.
    Hatziioannou K; Papanastassiou E; Delichas M; Bousbouras P
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Aug; 76(908):541-5. PubMed ID: 12893696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated framework for digital radiation dose index reporting from CT dose reports.
    Shih G; Lu ZF; Zabih R; Kennedy D; Loftus M; Shih WJ; Osborne J; Nickoloff E; Schwartz L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1170-4. PubMed ID: 22021511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
    Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.