BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11161174)

  • 1. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
    Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Full-size digital storage phosphor chest radiography: effect of 4K versus 2K matrix size on observer performance in detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities.
    Ueguchi T; Johkoh T; Tomiyama N; Honda O; Mihara N; Hamada S; Murai S; Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Nakamura H
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 15940063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.
    Koelblinger C; Prokop M; Weber M; Sailer J; Cartes-Zumelzu F; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2934-40. PubMed ID: 17492289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Oestmann JW; Hall DA; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1990 Jan; 174(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 2294549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.
    Kim SY; Hwang YJ; Han YH; Seo JW; Lee JY; Kim YH; Cha SJ; Hur G; Lee SS
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Dec; 20(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 17191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector. The impact of hard copy size on observer performance: a computed tomography-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graff Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jun; 32(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9179712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.
    Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Tomiyama N; Jokoh T; Kohno N; Takashima S; Yamagami H; Naito H
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 8475302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
    Flynn MJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The value of the supine chest x-ray with digital luminescence radiography in relation to the experience of the observer. A ROC analysis in CT-validated cases].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Strayle M; Linstedt-Hilden M; Dietz K; Deusch H; Hoffmann W; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8043760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
    Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mediastinal abnormalities: detection with storage phosphor digital radiography.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Hall DA; Lindemann SR; Llewellyn HJ; McCarthy KA; Pile-Spellman ER; Rubens JR
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 1984298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for the detection of interstitial lung markings on both storage phosphor and flat-panel-detector chest radiography.
    Sung YM; Chung MJ; Lee KS; Choe BK
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 74(1):275-9. PubMed ID: 19304429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of hard-copy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography.
    Schaefer CM; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Wiesmann W; Haubitz B; Meschede A; Reichelt S; Schirg E; Stender HS; Galanski M
    Radiology; 1992 Jul; 184(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 1609106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
    Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality of digital chest radiography: evaluation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities (preliminary study).
    Ikezoe J; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 May; 43(1-2):107-14. PubMed ID: 7956132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.