BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11161348)

  • 1. John Davis and the meanings of licking.
    Smith GP
    Appetite; 2001 Feb; 36(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 11161348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orosensory stimulation is sufficient and postingestive negative feedback is not necessary for neuropeptide Y to increase sucrose intake.
    Torregrossa AM; Davis JD; Smith GP
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 16540131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conditioned satiating effect of orosensory stimuli.
    Davis JD; Smith GP
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Jun; 97(3-4):293-303. PubMed ID: 19358860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal vagotomy alters the structure of the ingestive behavior of rats ingesting liquid diets.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Kung TM
    Behav Neurosci; 1994 Aug; 108(4):767-79. PubMed ID: 7986370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic and biobehavioral analysis of the controls of meal size in mice.
    Azzara AV
    Appetite; 2004 Feb; 42(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 15036789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions.
    Davis JD; Smith GP
    Behav Neurosci; 1992 Feb; 106(1):217-28. PubMed ID: 1554433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Post-ingestive positive controls of ingestive behavior.
    Sclafani A
    Appetite; 2001 Feb; 36(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 11161347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The controls of fat intake.
    Greenberg D; Smith GP
    Psychosom Med; 1996; 58(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 8948004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between orosensory and postingestional stimulation in the control of corn oil intake by rats.
    Davis JD; Kung TM; Rosenak R
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun; 57(6):1081-7. PubMed ID: 7652028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some new developments in the understanding of oropharyngeal and postingestional controls of meal size.
    Davis JD
    Nutrition; 1999 Jan; 15(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9918060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ontogeny of ingestive behavior.
    Smith GP
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Jul; 48(5):345-59. PubMed ID: 16770762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of feeding in aplysia with ad libitum access to food: presence of food increases the intervals between feeding bouts.
    Hurwitz I; Harel A; Markowitz S; Noy O; Susswein AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 95(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 16148266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Taste, salience, and increased NaCl ingestion after repeated sodium depletions.
    Dietz DM; Curtis KS; Contreras RJ
    Chem Senses; 2006 Jan; 31(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16306317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sham feeding in rats with chronic, reversible gastric fistulas.
    Smith GP
    Curr Protoc Neurosci; 2001 May; Chapter 8():Unit 8.6D. PubMed ID: 18428546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of neuropeptide Y on feeding microstructure: dissociation of appetitive and consummatory actions.
    Baird JP; Gray NE; Fischer SG
    Behav Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 120(4):937-51. PubMed ID: 16893299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory neurobiological analysis of neuropeptide modulation of meal size.
    Schwartz GJ; Azzara AV
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Aug; 82(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 15234595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory, digestive and metabolic influences on preference and intake.
    Booth DA
    Appetite; 2001 Feb; 36(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 11270359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Threonine-imbalanced diet alters first-meal microstructure in rats.
    Koehnle TJ; Stephens AL; Gietzen DW
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Mar; 81(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 15059679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contribution of orosensory stimulation to strain differences in oil intake by mice.
    Glendinning JI; Feld N; Goodman L; Bayor R
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 18691606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of milk-derived unconditioned and conditioned negative feedback on the microstructure of ingestive behavior.
    Davis JD; Smith GP; Singh B; McCann DP
    Physiol Behav; 2000; 70(3-4):279-85. PubMed ID: 11006426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.