BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11161362)

  • 1. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Freeman P; Tahmahkera-Stevens C; Chaussee M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Feb; 45(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11161362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Butler J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 11311040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 10683402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors.
    Porac C; Searleman A; Karagiannakis K
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug; 61(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16527384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reflecting upon line bisection: mirror reversal increases the magnitude of pseudoneglect.
    Brodie EE
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Apr; 48(5):1517-20. PubMed ID: 20060402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus A; Mayer K; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.
    McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rightward collisions and their association with pseudoneglect.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM; Orr CA; Barre N
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Nov; 68(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 18495310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric asymmetry and callosal integration of visuospatial attention in schizophrenia: a tachistoscopic line bisection study.
    McCourt ME; Shpaner M; Javitt DC; Foxe JJ
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 18485672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
    Roberts R; Turnbull OH
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks.
    Elias LJ; Robinson B; Saucier DM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 16293359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.