90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11162697)
1. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands.
de Rijke JM; Schouten LJ; Schreutelkamp JL; Jochem I; Verbeek AL
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10807142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing? East Anglian Breast Screening Programme.
McCann J; Britton PD; Warren RM; Hunnam G
J Med Screen; 2001; 8(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 11480448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme. Radiology Quality Assurance Group of BreastScreen Victoria.
Amos AF; Kavanagh AM; Cawson J
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 11202584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?
Gower-Thomas K; Fielder HM; Branston L; Greening S; Beer H; Rogers C
Clin Radiol; 2002 May; 57(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 12014936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classifying interval cancers.
Duncan AA; Wallis MG
Clin Radiol; 1995 Nov; 50(11):774-7. PubMed ID: 7489628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.
Scott HJ; Gale AG
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17209118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films.
Garvican L; Field S
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):833-7. PubMed ID: 11895300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality assessment of the mammographic screening programme in the Azienda Sanitaria locale Provincia Milano 1 -- analysis of interval cancers and discussion of possible causes of diagnostic error.
Burani R; Caimi F; Maggioni C; Marinoni G; Pellizzoni R; Pirola ME; Villa R; Ciatto S
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 15775895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geographical distribution of breast cancers on the mammogram: an interval cancer database.
Brown M; Eccles C; Wallis MG
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):317-22. PubMed ID: 11387148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes.
Houssami N; Irwig L; Ciatto S
Lancet Oncol; 2006 Mar; 7(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 16510335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate and classification of interval cancers in the breast screening programme.
Sylvester PA; Kutt E; Baird A; Vipond MN; Webb AJ; Farndon JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Jul; 79(4):276-7. PubMed ID: 9244072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification.
Ciatto S; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Risso G; Saguatti G; Abbattista T; Martinelli F; Houssami N
Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 17624779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?
Daly CA; Apthorp L; Field S
Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9464431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancers missed in the prevalent screening round: effect upon the size distribution of incident round detected cancers.
Maxwell AJ
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 10321367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms.
Taylor PM; Champness J; Given-Wilson RM; Potts HW; Johnston K
Br J Radiol; 2004 Jan; 77(913):21-7. PubMed ID: 14988134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Classification and characteristics of interval cancers in the Principality of Asturias's Breast Cancer Screening Program].
Prieto García MA; Delgado Sevillano R; Baldó Sierra C; González Díaz E; López Secades A; Llavona Amor JA; Vidal Marín B
Radiologia; 2013 Sep; 55(5):408-15. PubMed ID: 22520555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiologic analysis of interval cancers in the screening program called Florence Woman Project].
Morrone D; Giorgi D; Ciatto S; Ceresatto E; Catarzi S; Roselli Del Turco R
Radiol Med; 2000 Nov; 100(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 11213408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
