136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11163514)
1. A double exposed portal image comparison between electronic portal imaging hard copies and port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center.
Hatherly KE; Smylie JC; Rodger A; Dally MJ; Davis SR; Millar JL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 11163514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of field-only electronic portal imaging hard copies with double exposure port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center.
Hatherly K; Smylie J; Rodger A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 10524435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?
Valicenti RK; Michalski JM; Bosch WR; Gerber R; Graham MV; Cheng A; Purdy JA; Perez CA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 7928470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective clinical evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device.
Michalski JM; Graham MV; Bosch WR; Wong J; Gerber RL; Cheng A; Tinger A; Valicenti RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Mar; 34(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 8598374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of treatment setup variation on beam's eye view dosimetry for radiation therapy using the multileaf collimator vs. the cerrobend block.
Frazier A; Yan D; Du M; Wong J; Vicini F; Matter R; Joyce M; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1247-56. PubMed ID: 7493849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An observer study for direct comparison of clinical efficacy of electronic to film portal images.
Yin FF; Rubin P; Schell MC; Wynn R; Raubertas RF; Uschold G; Sandhu A; Nelson DF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Jul; 35(5):985-91. PubMed ID: 8751407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging.
Foulkes KM; Ostwald PM; Kron T
Med Dosim; 2001; 26(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11704465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of radiation exposure from portal films taken during definitive course of pediatric radiotherapy.
Kudchadker RJ; Chang EL; Bryan F; Maor MH; Famiglietti R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1229-35. PubMed ID: 15234060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial clinical experience with a video-based patient positioning system.
Johnson LS; Milliken BD; Hadley SW; Pelizzari CA; Haraf DJ; Chen GT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Aug; 45(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10477025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch.
De Neve W; Van den Heuvel F; De Beukeleer M; Coghe M; Thon L; De Roover P; Van Lancker M; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 1992 May; 24(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 1620887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observation study of electronic portal images for off-line verification.
Lavertu S; Girouard LM; Pouliot J
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Jan; 54(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 10719699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical use of on-line portal imaging for daily patient treatment verification.
Herman MG; Abrams RA; Mayer RR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Mar; 28(4):1017-23. PubMed ID: 8138427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The role of high-energy imaging in a radiotherapy service and its incorporation in a network].
Pradier O; Hille A; Schmidberger H; Hess CF
Cancer Radiother; 2001 Jun; 5(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 11446078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of geometric accuracy of radiotherapy fields by port film and DRR using Matlab graphical user interface.
Anjam SM; Banaee N; Rahmani H; Nedaie HA
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):259-269. PubMed ID: 30094755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision-making models in the analysis of portal films: a clinical pilot study.
See A; Kron T; Johansen J; Hamilton C; Bydder SA; Hawkins J; Roff M; Denham JW
Australas Radiol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 10761263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation therapy port films: a quality assurance study.
Morgan TL; Banks DA; Kagan AR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Aug; 42(1):223-7. PubMed ID: 9747841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is one head and neck immobilization system as good as another? One center's experience.
Lord L; May S; Bailey M; Smith L
Med Dosim; 2003; 28(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 12747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The investigation and rectification of field placement errors in the delivery of complex head and neck fields.
Dunscombe PB; Fox K; Loose S; Leszczynski K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Apr; 26(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 8482622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
