282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11163853)
1. Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
Häkkinen J; Nyman G
Vision Res; 2001 Jan; 41(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 11163853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone.
Gillam B; Nakayama K
Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 10211399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1699-711. PubMed ID: 21651926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phantom surfaces in da Vinci stereopsis.
Wardle SG; Gillam BJ
J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):16. PubMed ID: 23397041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Illusory occlusion affects stereoscopic depth perception.
Chen Z; Denison RN; Whitney D; Maus GW
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5297. PubMed ID: 29593236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus.
Grigo A; Lappe M
Vision Res; 1998 Jan; 38(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 9536354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon.
Lidén L; Mingolla E
Vision Res; 1998 Dec; 38(24):3883-98. PubMed ID: 10211381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monocular and binocular edges enhance the perception of stereoscopic slant.
Wardle SG; Palmisano S; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():113-23. PubMed ID: 24802594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. da Vinci decoded: does da Vinci stereopsis rely on disparity?
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23117672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binocular matching of dissimilar features in phantom stereopsis.
Liu L; Stevenson SB; Schor CM
Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(5):633-44. PubMed ID: 9156207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Solving da Vinci stereopsis with depth-edge-selective V2 cells.
Assee A; Qian N
Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2585-602. PubMed ID: 17698163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
Makino Y; Yano M
Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensionally slanted illusory contours capture stereopsis.
Häkkinen J; Liinasuo M; Kojo I; Nyman G
Vision Res; 1998 Oct; 38(20):3109-15. PubMed ID: 9893819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth.
Tanabe S; Yasuoka S; Fujita I
J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):3042-53. PubMed ID: 16986219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
