233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11164993)
1. The local lymph node assay and potential application to the identification of drug allergens.
Kimber I
Toxicology; 2001 Feb; 158(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11164993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals.
Ulrich P; Streich J; Suter W
Arch Toxicol; 2001 Feb; 74(12):733-44. PubMed ID: 11305775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of drug allergenicity: possible use of the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2001 Jan; 4(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11727324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Wright ZM; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Aug; 45(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 11553118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.
Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10513674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 10439339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation.
Kimber I; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Lea L; House RV; Ladics GS; Loveless SE; Hastings KL
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 1998 Apr; 53(7):563-79. PubMed ID: 9561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses.
Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Dickens A; Briggs D; Pate I; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 10439340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry.
Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA
Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay.
Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contact and respiratory sensitizers can be identified by cytokine profiles following inhalation exposure.
De Jong WH; Arts JH; De Klerk A; Schijf MA; Ezendam J; Kuper CF; Van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2009 Jul; 261(3):103-11. PubMed ID: 19422874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses.
Robinson MK; Cruze CA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of BALB/c and CBA/J mice for the local lymph node assay using bromodeoxyuridine with flow cytometry (LLNA: BrdU-FCM).
Lee YS; Yi JS; Seo SJ; Kim JH; Jung MS; Seo IK; Ahn I; Ko K; Kim TS; Lim KM; Sohn S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 83():13-22. PubMed ID: 27816673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
