These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11165215)

  • 41. Word category conversion causes processing costs: evidence from adjectival passives.
    Stolterfoht B; Gese H; Maienborn C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 21037162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In search of perceptual influences of sentence context on word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11827086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Linear grammar as a possible stepping-stone in the evolution of language.
    Jackendoff R; Wittenberg E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Feb; 24(1):219-224. PubMed ID: 27368633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments.
    Kelly MH
    Psychol Rev; 1992 Apr; 99(2):349-64. PubMed ID: 1594729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of semantic and syntactic context constraints on lexical selection and integration in spoken-word comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    van den Brink D; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1068-84. PubMed ID: 15298793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading.
    Birch S; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 9337583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Horizontal flow of semantic and phonological information in Chinese spoken sentence production.
    Yang JC; Yang YF
    Lang Speech; 2008; 51(Pt 3):267-84. PubMed ID: 19626927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition.
    Chater N; Manning CD
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16784883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Agrammatism in Spanish: a case study.
    Reznik M; Dubrovsky S; Maldonado S
    Brain Lang; 1995 Nov; 51(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 8564476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.
    Koizumi M; Imamura S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):247-260. PubMed ID: 27229871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).
    Farmer TA; Monaghan P; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1318-25. PubMed ID: 21895396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
    Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.
    Spivey-Knowlton M; Sedivy JC
    Cognition; 1995 Jun; 55(3):227-67. PubMed ID: 7634760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.
    Van Dyke JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):407-30. PubMed ID: 17352621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sentence reading: do we make use of orthographic cues in homophones?
    Brysbaert M; Grondelaers S; Ratinckx E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2000 Sep; 105(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 11057001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning.
    Jarosz G
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):565-606. PubMed ID: 20307347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning.
    Culbertson J; Smolensky P; Wilson C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):392-424. PubMed ID: 23703887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Phonological activation during visual word recognition in deaf and hearing children.
    Ormel E; Hermans D; Knoors H; Hendriks A; Verhoeven L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):801-20. PubMed ID: 20689045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Syntactic context effects on word recognition: a developmental study.
    Hyönä J; Lindeman J
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Mar; 35(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 8191259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detecting syntactic and semantic anomalies in schizophrenia.
    Moro A; Bambini V; Bosia M; Anselmetti S; Riccaboni R; Cappa SF; Smeraldi E; Cavallaro R
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Dec; 79(Pt A):147-57. PubMed ID: 26519554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.