These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11165446)

  • 1. Somatosensory event-related potentials in the rabbit cerebral and cerebellar cortices: a correspondence with mismatch responses in humans.
    Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb; 298(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 11165446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical and subcortical visual event-related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits.
    Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T
    Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1515-7. PubMed ID: 10841368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple-unit responses to pitch changes in rabbits.
    Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T; Arikoski J; Kivirikko K
    Neuroreport; 1996 May; 7(7):1266-8. PubMed ID: 8817546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ERPs to pitch changes: a result of reduced responses to standard tones in rabbits.
    Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T; Arikoski J; Kivirikko K
    Neuroreport; 1996 Jan; 7(2):413-6. PubMed ID: 8730794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The human brain processes visual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation.
    Astikainen P; Ruusuvirta T; Wikgren J; Korhonen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Sep; 368(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 15351455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerebellar damage impairs detection of somatosensory input changes. A somatosensory mismatch-negativity study.
    Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Valeriani M; Leggio MG; Molinari M
    Brain; 2007 Jan; 130(Pt 1):276-87. PubMed ID: 16982654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP and EOG responses elicited by deviant tones when presented with and without standard tones to reading subjects.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Nov; 42(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 11812394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Somatosensory automatic responses to deviant stimuli.
    Shinozaki N; Yabe H; Sutoh T; Hiruma T; Kaneko S
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Oct; 7(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 9774724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaction between afferent input from fingers in human somatosensory cortex.
    Forss N; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    Brain Res; 1995 Jul; 685(1-2):68-76. PubMed ID: 7583255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual Mismatch Negativity Reflects Enhanced Response to the Deviant: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials and Electroencephalogram Time-Frequency Analysis.
    Zeng X; Ji L; Liu Y; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():800855. PubMed ID: 35350445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of neck flexion on cerebral potentials evoked by visual, auditory and somatosensory stimuli and focal brain blood flow in related sensory cortices.
    Fujiwara K; Kunita K; Kiyota N; Mammadova A; Irei M
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2012 Dec; 31(1):31. PubMed ID: 23199306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The phases of visual cortex and hippocampal evoked potentials in rabbit reflect the orienting reaction in case of visual stimuli intensity changes].
    Polianskiĭ VB; Evtikhin DV; Sokolov EN
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2003; 53(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 12669504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in autistic children and three different control groups.
    Kemner C; Verbaten MN; Cuperus JM; Camfferman G; Van Engeland H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 92(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 7514992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical event-related potentials to pitch deviances in rats.
    Ruusuvirta T; Penttonen M; Korhonen T
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 May; 248(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9665660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of stimulus probability on the somatosensory mismatch field.
    Akatsuka K; Wasaka T; Nakata H; Kida T; Kakigi R
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 17516059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of somatosensory stimulation and attention on human somatosensory cortex: an fMRI study.
    Chen TL; Babiloni C; Ferretti A; Perrucci MG; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tartaro A; Del Gratta C
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):181-8. PubMed ID: 20598908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to symmetry as a perceptual category.
    Kecskés-Kovács K; Sulykos I; Czigler I
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 37(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 23167956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using somatosensory mismatch responses as a window into somatotopic processing of tactile stimulation.
    Shen G; Smyk NJ; Meltzoff AN; Marshall PJ
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13030. PubMed ID: 29139557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of nonlinear interactions in event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by stimuli presented at short inter-stimulus intervals.
    Mitsis GD; Iannetti GD
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4834-7. PubMed ID: 21096904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Somatosensory mismatch negativity in healthy children.
    Restuccia D; Zanini S; Cazzagon M; Del Piero I; Martucci L; Della Marca G
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2009 Dec; 51(12):991-8. PubMed ID: 19909309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.