These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11166108)

  • 1. Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate.
    Gödert HW; Rill HG; Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2001 Feb; 40(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 11166108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: potentially confounding and influencing factors.
    Vincent A; Furedy JJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 Sep; 13(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 1399752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal physiological effects of electrodermal lability in the detection of deception.
    Waid WM; Wilson SK; Orne MT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1981 Jun; 40(6):1118-25. PubMed ID: 7264879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: perceived accuracy and perceived memorial content manipulations.
    Furedy JJ; Posner RT; Vincent A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Jul; 11(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 1856118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items.
    Furedy JJ; Gigliotti F; Ben-Shakhar G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Oct; 18(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 7876035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting versus inhibition in the Concealed Information Test: Different cognitive processes drive different physiological measures.
    klein Selle N; Verschuere B; Kindt M; Meijer E; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 26615984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents.
    Gamer M; Gödert HW; Keth A; Rill HG; Vossel G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jul; 69(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 18433904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of negative motivation on the behavioral and autonomic correlates of deception.
    Suchotzki K; Gamer M
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13284. PubMed ID: 30187497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotional intelligence buffers the effect of physiological arousal on dishonesty.
    Pittarello A; Conte B; Caserotti M; Scrimin S; Rubaltelli E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):440-446. PubMed ID: 28409438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Startling secrets: startle eye blink modulation by concealed crime information.
    Verschuere B; Crombez G; Koster EH; Van Bockstaele B; De Clercq A
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):52-60. PubMed ID: 17656000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing.
    Dollins AB; Cestaro VL; Pettit DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 9729818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysiological correlates of the misinformation effect.
    Volz K; Leonhart R; Stark R; Vaitl D; Ambach W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jul; 117():1-9. PubMed ID: 28400245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
    Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 18180065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: a meta analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data.
    Meijer EH; klein Selle N; Elber L; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Sep; 51(9):879-904. PubMed ID: 24916920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrodermal lability and hypertension.
    Kronholm E; Hyyppä MT; Jula A; Toikka T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 23(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 8880373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paranoid-nonparanoid differences--psychophysiological parallels.
    Rippon G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 Jul; 13(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 1522036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of the autonomic nervous system in the electrohypersensitive population: a heart rate variability and skin conductance study.
    Andrianome S; Gobert J; Hugueville L; Stéphan-Blanchard E; Telliez F; Selmaoui B
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2017 Nov; 123(5):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 28620054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge.
    Furedy JJ; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 1946882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.