152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11167191)
1. Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a survey of gynecological practice.
Clark TJ; Daniels J; Khan KS; Gupta JK
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Jan; 80(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 11167191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Raju KS; Auld BJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Dec; 101(12):1068-71. PubMed ID: 7826960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials.
Nwosu CR; Gupta JK
Surg Endosc; 1999 Feb; 13(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 9918618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.
Gross CP; Nicholson W; Powe NR
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 94(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 10576183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive hysterectomies-a survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists.
Einarsson JI; Matteson KA; Schulkin J; Chavan NR; Sangi-Haghpeykar H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 20226403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practice variation in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at benign abdominal hysterectomy: a population-based study.
Cusimano MC; Moineddin R; Chiu M; Ferguson SE; Aktar S; Liu N; Baxter NN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):585.e1-585.e30. PubMed ID: 33359174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current practice of hysterectomy and oophorectomy in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
Kay VJ; Das N; Mahmood TA; Smith A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Nov; 22(6):672-80. PubMed ID: 12554262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy among Taiwanese women undergoing benign hysterectomy: a population-based, pooled, cross-sectional study.
Lai JC; Huang N; Wang KL; Hu HY; Chen IT; Chou YJ
Menopause; 2015 Jul; 22(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 25387346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes and clinical practice of Italian gynecologists towards prophylactic oophorectomy during hysterectomy for benign conditions.
Mezzopane R; Ricci E; Chatenoud L; Cisternino A; Chiantera A; Parazzini F
Maturitas; 1996 Jul; 24(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 8844629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Danish gynecologists' opinion about hysterectomy on benign indication: results of a survey.
Gimbel H; Ottesen B; Tabor A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Dec; 81(12):1123-31. PubMed ID: 12519108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
Phipps JH; John M; Nayak S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):698-700. PubMed ID: 8080472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Current knowledge of risks and benefits of prophylactic oophorectomy at hysterectomy for benign disease in United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
Das N; Kay VJ; Mahmood TA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jul; 109(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 12818449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes of Israeli gynecologists towards risk reduction salpingo-oophorectomy at hysterectomy for benign conditions and the use of hormonal therapy.
Assaf W; Andraous M; Lavie O; Segev Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():48-54. PubMed ID: 35279641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy.
Kovac SR; Cruikshank SH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 175(6):1483-8. PubMed ID: 8987929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for endometrial cancer: morbidity and survival.
Magrina JF; Mutone NF; Weaver AL; Magtibay PM; Fowler RS; Cornella JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Aug; 181(2):376-81. PubMed ID: 10454686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.
Devaja O; Samara I; Papadopoulos AJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 20686375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inappropriate oophorectomy at time of benign premenopausal hysterectomy.
Mahal AS; Rhoads KF; Elliott CS; Sokol ER
Menopause; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28486247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Review of Laparoscopic Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Technique and Perioperative Considerations.
Lozada Y; Bhagavath B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):364-370. PubMed ID: 28027976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective oophorectomy in the United States: trends and in-hospital complications, 1998-2006.
Asante A; Whiteman MK; Kulkarni A; Cox S; Marchbanks PA; Jamieson DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Nov; 116(5):1088-95. PubMed ID: 20966693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy more efficient in operative treatment of endometrial cancer?
Barwijuk A; Jankowska S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 25(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 16263547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
