These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11168192)

  • 21. Radiographic evaluation of implant-obscured bone. Comparison of digitally subtracted tomographic and periapical techniques.
    Ludlow JB; Gates W; Nason R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 7489280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
    Taguchi A; Tanimoto K; Akagawa Y; Suei Y; Wada T; Rohlin M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 9442622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
    Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon's Dental 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography System.
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2007 Jun; 18(6):41-5. PubMed ID: 17682685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cross-sectional tomograms obtained with four panoramic radiographic units in the assessment of implant site measurements.
    Peltola JS; Mattila M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 15585805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas.
    Wilding RJ; Levin I; Pepper R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Nov; 14(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 3481395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
    Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
    J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
    Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
    Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Sağlam AA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S; von Beetzen M; Jansson L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 9151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodologic study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements.
    Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Nummikoski PV; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.