BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11168196)

  • 1. Behavior of implants in bone grafts or free flaps after tumor resection.
    Chiapasco M; Abati S; Ramundo G; Rossi A; Romeo E; Vogel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Feb; 11(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 11168196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early bone resorption of free microvascular reanastomized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction--a comparison of iliac crest and fibula grafts.
    Mertens C; Decker C; Engel M; Sander A; Hoffmann J; Freier K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e217-23. PubMed ID: 24269641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term results of mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection.
    Chiapasco M; Colletti G; Romeo E; Zaniboni M; Brusati R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1074-80. PubMed ID: 18828825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M; Casentini P; Zaniboni M; Corsi E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22092480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.
    Chiapasco M; Gatti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthetic design related to peri-implant bone resorption in microvascular free fibular flap among patients with oral cancer: A retrospective clinical study.
    Huang YF; Liu SP; Muo CH; Chang CT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):395-399. PubMed ID: 31864639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant prosthodontic rehabilitation of fibula free-flap reconstructed mandibles: a Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center review of prognostic factors and implant outcomes.
    Teoh KH; Huryn JM; Patel S; Halpern J; Tunick S; Wong HB; Zlotolow IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 16274148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of pericranium grafts in the reduction of postoperative dehiscences and bone resorption after reconstruction of severely deficient edentulous ridges with autogenous onlay bone grafts.
    Chiapasco M; Autelitano L; Rabbiosi D; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 22551410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative analysis of dental implant treatment outcomes following mandibular reconstruction with double-barrel fibula bone grafting or vertical distraction osteogenesis fibula: a retrospective study.
    Wang F; Huang W; Zhang C; Sun J; Kaigler D; Wu Y
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 24299036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different transplanted soft tissues on bone resorption around loaded endosseous implants in patients after oral tumor surgery.
    Kovács A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):554-60. PubMed ID: 9714963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fresh frozen versus autogenous iliac bone for the rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla with onlay grafts and endosseous implants: preliminary results of a prospective comparative study.
    Chiapasco M; Di Martino G; Anello T; Zaniboni M; Romeo E
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e251-66. PubMed ID: 24373321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of osseointegrated dental implants in double-barrel and vertically distracted fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flaps for segmental mandibular defect reconstruction.
    Chang YM; Wallace CG; Hsu YM; Shen YF; Tsai CY; Wei FC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Nov; 134(5):1033-1043. PubMed ID: 25054246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis.
    Chiapasco M; Biglioli F; Autelitano L; Romeo E; Brusati R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):220-8. PubMed ID: 16584419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome of partial mandibular reconstruction with fibula grafts and implant-supported prostheses.
    Parbo N; Murra NT; Andersen K; Buhl J; Kiil B; Nørholt SE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 42(11):1403-8. PubMed ID: 23773236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems with dental implants that were placed on vertically distracted fibular free flaps after resection: a report of six cases.
    Lizio G; Corinaldesi G; Pieri F; Marchetti C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 19576667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental implants placed in severely atrophic jaws reconstructed with autogenous calvarium, bovine bone mineral, and collagen membranes: A 3- to 19-year retrospective follow-up study.
    Chiapasco M; Tommasato G; Palombo D; Scarnò D; Zaniboni M; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):725-740. PubMed ID: 29876968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rehabilitation of patients with reconstructed mandibles using osseointegrated implants: clinical report.
    Papageorge MB; Karabetou SM; Norris LH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 10074762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective clinical evaluation of an internal tube-in-tube dental implant after 4 years, with special emphasis on peri-implant bone resorption.
    Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW; Morbach T; Ophoven F; Wagner W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1309-16. PubMed ID: 22167438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aesthetic and functional mandibular reconstruction with immediate dental implants in a free fibular flap and a low-profile reconstruction plate: five-year follow-up.
    Shen YF; Rodriguez ED; Wei FC; Tsai CY; Chang YM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Apr; 74(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 24149408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.