326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11168273)
1. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry.
Birkfellner W; Solar P; Gahleitner A; Huber K; Kainberger F; Kettenbach J; Homolka P; Diemling M; Watzek G; Bergmann H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 11168273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental validation of predicted application accuracies for computer-assisted (CAS) intraoperative navigation with paired-point registration.
Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Mar; 13(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 28801767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible.
Wanschitz F; Birkfellner W; Watzinger F; Schopper C; Patruta S; Kainberger F; Figl M; Kettenbach J; Bergmann H; Ewers R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Feb; 13(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 12005146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 2D/3D registration of endoscopic ultrasound to CT volume data.
Hummel J; Figl M; Bax M; Bergmann H; Birkfellner W
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(16):4303-16. PubMed ID: 18653922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy assessment of a marker-free method for registration of CT and stereo images applied in image-guided implantology: a phantom study.
Mohagheghi S; Ahmadian A; Yaghoobee S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 25441868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fiducial markers configuration optimization in image-guided surgery.
Bao N; Chen Y; Yue Y; Li H; Cui Z; Zhuang J; Tian S; Kang Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3361-71. PubMed ID: 25227046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time estimation of FLE statistics for 3-D tracking with point-based registration.
Wiles AD; Peters TM
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1384-98. PubMed ID: 19336301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative fiducial-less patient registration using volumetric 3D ultrasound: a prospective series of 32 neurosurgical cases.
Fan X; Roberts DW; Ji S; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
J Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 123(3):721-31. PubMed ID: 26140481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points.
Qin C; Cao Z; Fan S; Wu Y; Sun Y; Politis C; Wang C; Chen X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Feb; 14(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30317436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration.
Fitzpatrick JM; West JB; Maurer CR
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Oct; 17(5):694-702. PubMed ID: 9874293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study.
Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probe versus microscope: a comparison of different methods for image-to-patient registration.
Perwög M; Bardosi Z; Diakov G; Jeleff O; Kral F; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Oct; 13(10):1539-1548. PubMed ID: 29869745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver.
Noharet R; Pettersson A; Bourgeois D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 24721507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
